CMGG vs. XDSQ
CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
CMGG vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGG achieves a -47.85% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 2.84% return.
CMGG
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -25.63%
- YTD
- -47.85%
- 6M
- -39.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 16.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- —
CMGG vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF | -47.85% | 43.86% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.84% | 4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGG and XDSQ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMGG vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
CMGG
XDSQ
CMGG vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMGG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | 0.69 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
CMGG vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGG drawdown since its inception was -56.75%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.75% | -26.06% | -30.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.75% | 0.00% | -56.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.34% | -4.96% | -16.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
CMGG vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMGG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.82% | 10.54% | +56.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.82% | 15.27% | +51.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.82% | 15.09% | +51.73% |
CMGG vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMGG vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMGG nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMGG and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDSQ.
CMGG and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CMGG and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for CMGG and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer