CMGG vs. XDSQ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

CMGG vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMGG achieves a -20.13% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 4.31% return.

CMGG

• 1D: 4.18%
• 1M: 17.79%
• 6M: -31.72%
• YTD: -20.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDSQ

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 1.29%
• 6M: 2.79%
• YTD: 4.31%
• 1Y: 14.91%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMGG vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	-20.13%	36.20%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	4.31%	3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CMGG and XDSQ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

CMGG vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMGG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 50
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMGG vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMGG	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.94	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.32	—

Drawdowns

CMGG vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMGG drawdown since its inception was -56.75%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMGG	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.75%	-26.06%	-30.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.76%	0.00%	-33.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.50%	-4.87%	-19.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CMGG	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.32%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.90%	10.53%	+59.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.90%	15.27%	+54.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.90%	14.96%	+54.94%

CMGG vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMGG vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMGG nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMGG and XDSQ in my portfolio?

CMGG and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMGG or XDSQ?

On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMGG or XDSQ?

CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CMGG or XDSQ?

CMGG and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CMGG and XDSQ?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CMGG and 0.79% for XDSQ.