CMGG vs. WTIU
CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CMGG is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. CMGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
CMGG vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGG achieves a -39.24% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 45.60% return.
CMGG
- 1D
- -11.56%
- 1M
- -15.34%
- YTD
- -39.24%
- 6M
- -42.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- 4.63%
- 1M
- -24.41%
- YTD
- 45.60%
- 6M
- 48.75%
- 1Y
- 26.54%
- 3Y*
- 0.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMGG vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF | -39.24% | 36.20% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 45.60% | -15.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGG and WTIU is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMGG vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
CMGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WTIU
CMGG vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMGG | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMGG vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGG drawdown since its inception was -56.75%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGG | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.75% | -75.73% | +18.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.61% | -48.39% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.20% | -39.18% | +15.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.82% | — |
Volatility
CMGG vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMGG | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.07% | 68.93% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.07% | 70.83% | -1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.07% | 70.83% | -1.76% |
CMGG vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMGG vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMGG nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMGG and WTIU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.
CMGG and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CMGG and 0.95% for WTIU.
Find the right allocation for CMGG and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer