PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMG vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMG vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMG achieves a -12.89% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 37.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CMG has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 15.09%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 16.43% annualized return.


CMG

1D
3.14%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-12.89%
6M
-10.82%
1Y
-35.85%
3Y*
-7.94%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
15.09%

QCLN

1D
1.67%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
37.91%
6M
35.67%
1Y
90.42%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
-0.62%
10Y*
16.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMG vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
-12.89%-38.64%31.83%64.83%-20.64%26.07%65.65%93.87%49.39%-23.40%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
37.91%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CMG and QCLN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2007

0.39

The correlation between CMG and QCLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMG vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMG
CMG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMG vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMGQCLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.37

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

5.51

-6.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

18.21

-19.25

CMG vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMG and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMG vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMG drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, roughly equal to the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMG and QCLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMGQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.61%

-76.18%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.61%

-16.40%

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.89%

-56.08%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.89%

-69.49%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.89%

-71.73%

+12.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.98%

-28.75%

-24.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.37%

-43.42%

+22.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.40%

4.95%

+30.45%

Volatility

CMG vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) is 10.80%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that CMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMGQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.80%

16.96%

-6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.87%

28.95%

-5.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.63%

36.71%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.60%

38.33%

-4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.63%

35.10%

+0.53%

Dividends

CMG vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.16%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMG and QCLN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCLN has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to CMG (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMG dropped -74.61% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMG and QCLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer