CMG vs. QCLN
CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.) is a stock, while QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. Over the past 10 years, CMG returned 15.09%/yr vs 16.43%/yr for QCLN. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMG vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMG achieves a -12.89% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 37.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CMG has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 15.09%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 16.43% annualized return.
CMG
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -12.89%
- 6M
- -10.82%
- 1Y
- -35.85%
- 3Y*
- -7.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
QCLN
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 37.91%
- 6M
- 35.67%
- 1Y
- 90.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 16.43%
CMG vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | -12.89% | -38.64% | 31.83% | 64.83% | -20.64% | 26.07% | 65.65% | 93.87% | 49.39% | -23.40% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 37.91% | 31.81% | -18.86% | -10.02% | -30.37% | -3.21% | 184.00% | 42.65% | -12.38% | 32.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMG and QCLN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2007 | 0.39 |
The correlation between CMG and QCLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMG vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
CMG
QCLN
CMG vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMG | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.37 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 5.51 | -6.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 18.21 | -19.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMG vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMG drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, roughly equal to the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMG and QCLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMG | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.61% | -76.18% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.61% | -16.40% | -35.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.89% | -56.08% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.89% | -69.49% | +10.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.89% | -71.73% | +12.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.98% | -28.75% | -24.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.37% | -43.42% | +22.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.40% | 4.95% | +30.45% |
Volatility
CMG vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) is 10.80%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that CMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMG | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.80% | 16.96% | -6.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.87% | 28.95% | -5.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.63% | 36.71% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.60% | 38.33% | -4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.63% | 35.10% | +0.53% |
Dividends
CMG vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.16% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMG and QCLN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCLN has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to CMG (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMG dropped -74.61% vs QCLN's -76.18%.
QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMG and QCLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer