PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMG vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMG vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMG achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 36.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CMG has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 12.72%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.79% annualized return.


CMG

1D
-1.78%
1M
-10.13%
YTD
-22.32%
6M
-15.30%
1Y
-42.60%
3Y*
-11.34%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
12.72%

PDBC

1D
0.39%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
36.23%
6M
36.27%
1Y
45.46%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMG vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
-22.32%-38.64%31.83%64.83%-20.64%26.07%65.65%93.87%49.39%-23.40%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
36.23%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%-7.84%11.44%-12.78%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CMG and PDBC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

0.09

The correlation between CMG and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMG vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMG
CMG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
CMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMG vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMGPDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.43

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

6.35

-7.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

13.39

-14.62

CMG vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMG Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is lower than the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMG and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMGPDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.11

2.46

-3.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.65

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.50

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.23

+0.26

Drawdowns

CMG vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMG drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMG and PDBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMGPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.61%

-49.52%

-25.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.65%

-7.19%

-43.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.08%

-13.95%

-44.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.08%

-27.63%

-30.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.08%

-40.73%

-17.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.08%

-4.55%

-53.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.33%

-23.21%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.47%

3.41%

+31.06%

Volatility

CMG vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a higher volatility of 9.37% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 6.20%. This indicates that CMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMGPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.37%

6.20%

+3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.93%

15.78%

+7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.41%

18.61%

+19.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.50%

19.12%

+14.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.63%

17.78%

+17.85%

Dividends

CMG vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.82%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMG and PDBC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMG has higher volatility (9.37%) compared to PDBC (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMG dropped -74.61% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMG and PDBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer