CMG vs. PDBC
CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.) is a stock, while PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) is Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, CMG returned 16.29%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMG vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMG achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 27.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CMG has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 16.29%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.
CMG
- 1D
- 3.91%
- 1M
- 13.65%
- 6M
- -9.20%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- -34.59%
- 3Y*
- -3.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
PDBC
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 22.82%
- YTD
- 27.55%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
CMG vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | -1.00% | -38.64% | 31.83% | 64.83% | -20.64% | 26.07% | 65.65% | 93.87% | 49.39% | -23.40% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 27.55% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMG and PDBC is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.09 |
The correlation between CMG and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMG vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
CMG
PDBC
CMG vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMG | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.28 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 1.86 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 6.57 | -7.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMG vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMG drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMG and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMG | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.61% | -49.52% | -25.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.60% | -16.55% | -32.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.89% | -16.55% | -42.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.89% | -27.63% | -31.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.89% | -40.73% | -18.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.57% | -10.63% | -35.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.48% | -23.11% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.91% | 4.69% | +30.22% |
Volatility
CMG vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a higher volatility of 12.43% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 6.25%. This indicates that CMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMG | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.43% | 6.25% | +6.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.84% | 16.77% | +9.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.56% | 18.90% | +20.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.95% | 19.24% | +14.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.73% | 17.76% | +17.97% |
Dividends
CMG vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.01% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMG and PDBC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMG has higher volatility (12.43%) compared to PDBC (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMG dropped -74.61% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMG and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer