CMG vs. MU
CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. CMG operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CMG returned 15.09%/yr vs 55.83%/yr for MU. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMG vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMG achieves a -12.89% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CMG has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 15.09%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.83% annualized return.
CMG
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- -12.89%
- 6M
- -10.82%
- 1Y
- -36.67%
- 3Y*
- -7.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
MU
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 22.15%
- YTD
- 244.07%
- 6M
- 307.41%
- 1Y
- 746.93%
- 3Y*
- 144.69%
- 5Y*
- 66.21%
- 10Y*
- 55.83%
CMG vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | -12.89% | -38.64% | 31.83% | 64.83% | -20.64% | 26.07% | 65.65% | 93.87% | 49.39% | -23.40% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 244.07% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMG and MU is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2006 | 0.28 |
The correlation between CMG and MU shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CMG:
$41.96B
MU:
$1.12T
CMG:
$1.09
MU:
$21.26
CMG:
29.48
MU:
46.18
CMG:
1.10
MU:
0.17
CMG:
3.53
MU:
19.16
CMG:
17.43
MU:
15.44
CMG:
$12.14B
MU:
$58.12B
CMG:
$4.39B
MU:
$33.96B
CMG:
$2.30B
MU:
$25.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMG vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
CMG
MU
CMG vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.78 | -0.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 24.91 | -25.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 94.64 | -95.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMG vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMG drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMG and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.61% | -98.25% | +23.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.61% | -30.28% | -21.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.89% | -57.63% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.89% | -57.63% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.89% | -57.63% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.98% | -9.07% | -43.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.37% | -58.16% | +36.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.40% | 7.95% | +27.45% |
Volatility
CMG vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) is 10.80%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that CMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.80% | 32.86% | -22.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.87% | 57.74% | -33.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.63% | 69.66% | -31.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.60% | 53.18% | -19.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.63% | 50.12% | -14.49% |
Dividends
CMG vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Financials
CMG vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMG vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
CMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.11B and revenue of 3.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.
CMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported an operating income of 397.06M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.
CMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a net income of 302.82M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMG and MU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to CMG (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMG dropped -74.61% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMG and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer