PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMEY.TO vs. CINF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMEY.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield Fund (CMEY.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMEY.TO achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than CINF.TO's 17.05% return.


CMEY.TO

1D
0.31%
1M
0.16%
6M
1.64%
YTD
2.26%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*

CINF.TO

1D
-0.52%
1M
-0.38%
6M
13.71%
YTD
17.05%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMEY.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CMEY.TO
CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield Fund
2.26%4.69%7.07%6.63%-1.29%3.42%5.16%
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool
17.05%12.54%16.53%5.27%5.03%13.56%7.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CMEY.TO and CINF.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2020

0.10

The correlation between CMEY.TO and CINF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMEY.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMEY.TO
CMEY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CMEY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CINF.TO
CINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMEY.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield Fund (CMEY.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMEY.TOCINF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

4.09

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

12.09

-1.43

CMEY.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMEY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMEY.TO and CINF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMEY.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMEY.TO drawdown since its inception was -4.73%, smaller than the maximum CINF.TO drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMEY.TO and CINF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMEY.TOCINF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-12.27%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.41%

-5.31%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.96%

-9.62%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.73%

-12.27%

+7.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-1.07%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-2.05%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

1.79%

-1.37%

Volatility

CMEY.TO vs. CINF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield Fund (CMEY.TO) is 1.05%, while CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that CMEY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMEY.TOCINF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

2.03%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

7.75%

-5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

9.56%

-6.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

11.96%

-8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.63%

12.07%

-8.44%

Dividends

CMEY.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison

CMEY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than CINF.TO's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool
2.42%2.80%3.06%3.45%3.51%3.56%2.27%
CMEY.TO
CI Marret Alternative Enhanced Yield Fund
4.38%4.38%5.85%5.91%4.79%4.70%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMEY.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMEY.TO is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while CINF.TO is Utilities Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMEY.TO and CINF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer