PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMEUX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMEUX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMEUX achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 8.19% return.


CMEUX

1D
-1.43%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
7.79%
6M
6.56%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*

WFSPX

1D
-1.43%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
6.86%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
15.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMEUX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
7.79%18.38%24.94%29.09%-20.29%26.65%29.12%12.13%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
8.19%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%12.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CMEUX and WFSPX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2019

0.96

The correlation between CMEUX and WFSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMEUX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMEUX
CMEUX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CMEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMEUX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMEUXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.67

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.00

11.99

-0.99

CMEUX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMEUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMEUX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMEUX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMEUX drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMEUX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMEUXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-58.21%

+29.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-8.90%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-18.74%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-24.51%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-3.13%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-12.76%

+7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.98%

+0.27%

Volatility

CMEUX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) at 4.90%. This indicates that CMEUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMEUXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

4.90%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

9.93%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

12.56%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.06%

16.98%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.97%

18.04%

+1.93%

CMEUX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMEUX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMEUX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

CMEUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than WFSPX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
0.94%1.01%1.02%1.16%1.52%4.12%3.33%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
1.61%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, CMEUX and WFSPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CMEUX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to WFSPX (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMEUX dropped -28.39% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

CMEUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMEUX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer