PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMEUX vs. CMIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMEUX vs. CMIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMEUX achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than CMIUX's 7.41% return.


CMEUX

1D
-0.77%
1M
4.77%
YTD
11.21%
6M
10.79%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*

CMIUX

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.35%
YTD
7.41%
6M
10.61%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMEUX vs. CMIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
11.21%18.38%24.94%29.09%-20.29%26.65%29.12%12.13%
CMIUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund
7.41%33.36%2.63%20.07%-12.61%19.72%9.26%4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between CMEUX and CMIUX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

0.72

The correlation between CMEUX and CMIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMEUX vs. CMIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMEUX
CMEUX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CMEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

CMIUX
CMIUX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CMIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CMIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMEUX vs. CMIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMEUXCMIUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.25

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

1.75

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.16

6.45

+7.71

CMEUX vs. CMIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMEUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the CMIUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMEUX and CMIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMEUXCMIUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.35

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.55

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.56

+0.31

Drawdowns

CMEUX vs. CMIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMEUX drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, smaller than the maximum CMIUX drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMEUX and CMIUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMEUXCMIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-36.83%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-11.76%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-14.30%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-29.49%

+3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-2.60%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-5.73%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

3.18%

-1.03%

Volatility

CMEUX vs. CMIUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) is 2.92%, while Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that CMEUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMEUXCMIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

5.28%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

12.86%

-3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.22%

15.30%

-3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

17.85%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

19.73%

+0.23%

CMEUX vs. CMIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMEUX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CMIUX's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMEUX vs. CMIUX - Dividend Comparison

CMEUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than CMIUX's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
0.91%1.01%1.02%1.16%1.52%4.12%3.33%1.72%
CMIUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund
2.44%2.62%2.96%2.25%2.98%1.93%1.81%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMEUX and CMIUX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMIUX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to CMEUX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMEUX dropped -28.39% vs CMIUX's -36.83%.

CMEUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMEUX and CMIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer