CME vs. KGC
CME (CME Group Inc.) and KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. CME operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services), while KGC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CME returned 15.38%/yr vs 18.81%/yr for KGC. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CME vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CME achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's -8.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CME has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of 15.38%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.81% annualized return.
CME
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
KGC
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -18.08%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 6M
- -8.14%
- 1Y
- 65.63%
- 3Y*
- 76.13%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
CME vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 1.58% | 19.83% | 15.41% | 31.32% | -22.89% | 29.47% | -6.34% | 9.67% | 32.15% | 32.35% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -8.92% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CME and KGC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2002 | 0.09 |
The correlation between CME and KGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CME:
$97.90B
KGC:
$30.80B
CME:
$11.75
KGC:
$2.35
CME:
22.94
KGC:
10.87
CME:
2.00
KGC:
0.14
CME:
14.40
KGC:
3.92
CME:
3.68
KGC:
3.37
CME:
$6.76B
KGC:
$7.94B
CME:
$5.84B
KGC:
$4.19B
CME:
$5.69B
KGC:
$5.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CME vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
CME
KGC
CME vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CME Group Inc. (CME) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CME | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.24 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.75 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | 5.20 | -4.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CME vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CME drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CME and KGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CME | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.50% | -96.00% | +18.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.42% | -37.69% | +16.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -37.69% | +16.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.74% | -59.29% | +27.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.36% | -67.75% | +30.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.03% | -32.63% | +17.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.68% | -57.60% | +36.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 12.66% | -5.96% |
Volatility
CME vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CME Group Inc. (CME) is 10.45%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a volatility of 18.21%. This indicates that CME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CME | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 18.21% | -7.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 40.59% | -23.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.74% | 51.35% | -30.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 44.22% | -24.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 47.01% | -23.08% |
Dividends
CME vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
CME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than KGC's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.17% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.57% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CME vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CME Group Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CME vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison
CME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 1.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.1%.
KGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.
CME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 69.7%.
KGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
CME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in a net margin of 61.4%.
KGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CME and KGC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KGC has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to CME (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CME dropped -77.50% vs KGC's -96.00%.
KGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CME and KGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer