CMDY vs. IVV
CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMDY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CMDY returned 9.18%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for IVV. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMDY charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
CMDY vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMDY achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 8.20% return.
CMDY
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 23.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
CMDY vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 14.22% | 15.81% | 5.43% | -9.33% | 14.55% | 26.38% | 1.15% | 4.96% | -11.13% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.20% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -3.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMDY and IVV is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.24 |
The correlation between CMDY and IVV shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMDY vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
CMDY
IVV
CMDY vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMDY | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.68 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 11.98 | -4.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMDY vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMDY drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMDY and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMDY | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.19% | -55.25% | +24.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -8.89% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.56% | -18.75% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.56% | -24.53% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.56% | -3.14% | -9.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -10.76% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 1.99% | +1.10% |
Volatility
CMDY vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) is 3.63%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that CMDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMDY | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 4.88% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | 9.85% | +4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.35% | 12.48% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 16.98% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 18.07% | -3.44% |
CMDY vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMDY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMDY vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
CMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, more than IVV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 11.29% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMDY and IVV have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to CMDY (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMDY dropped -31.19% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.13% vs 9.18% for CMDY. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, CMDY has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.
CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 1.11% for IVV.
CMDY is categorized as Commodities, while IVV is S&P 500. CMDY tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CMDY and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMDY and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer