PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMDO.TO vs. VALT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMDO.TO vs. VALT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund (CMDO.TO) and CI Gold Bullion ETF (VALT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMDO.TO achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly higher than VALT.TO's -6.93% return.


CMDO.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.74%
6M
0.97%
YTD
1.93%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.44%

VALT.TO

1D
0.19%
1M
1.59%
6M
-19.64%
YTD
-6.93%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$15.20KCA$29.38KCA$28.11K
CA$185.75KCA$223.40KCA$363.49K

CMDO.TO vs. VALT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CMDO.TO
CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund
1.93%7.40%3.86%5.89%-2.66%0.80%
VALT.TO
CI Gold Bullion ETF
-6.93%60.46%25.58%12.35%0.92%0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CMDO.TO and VALT.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMDO.TO vs. VALT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMDO.TO
CMDO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CMDO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VALT.TO
VALT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
VALT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VALT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMDO.TO vs. VALT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund (CMDO.TO) and CI Gold Bullion ETF (VALT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMDO.TOVALT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.14

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

0.66

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

1.48

+10.76

CMDO.TO vs. VALT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMDO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the VALT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMDO.TO and VALT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMDO.TO vs. VALT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMDO.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.85%, smaller than the maximum VALT.TO drawdown of -27.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMDO.TO and VALT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMDO.TOVALT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-27.07%

+20.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.54%

-27.07%

+25.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.41%

-27.07%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-25.75%

+24.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-6.25%

+4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

12.03%

-11.64%

Volatility

CMDO.TO vs. VALT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund (CMDO.TO) is 1.00%, while CI Gold Bullion ETF (VALT.TO) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that CMDO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VALT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMDO.TOVALT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

6.20%

-5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

24.23%

-21.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40%

28.23%

-24.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

18.62%

-12.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

18.21%

-12.15%

CMDO.TO vs. VALT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMDO.TO has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VALT.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMDO.TO vs. VALT.TO - Dividend Comparison

CMDO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, while VALT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CMDO.TO
CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund
3.84%3.84%3.97%3.96%2.15%1.00%
VALT.TO
CI Gold Bullion ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMDO.TO and VALT.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VALT.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VALT.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for CMDO.TO.

CMDO.TO is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while VALT.TO is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for CMDO.TO and 0.17% for VALT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMDO.TO and VALT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer