CMCMX vs. ETEGX
CMCMX (Conestoga Micro Cap Fund) and ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, CMCMX returned 10.22%/yr vs 4.53%/yr for ETEGX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMCMX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for ETEGX.
Performance
CMCMX vs. ETEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCMX achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly higher than ETEGX's 0.97% return.
CMCMX
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETEGX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- -1.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.10%
CMCMX vs. ETEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCMX Conestoga Micro Cap Fund | 5.22% | 16.41% | 13.03% | -2.75% | 3.42% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 0.97% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 11.28% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMCMX and ETEGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CMCMX and ETEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMCMX vs. ETEGX — Risk / Return Rank
CMCMX
ETEGX
CMCMX vs. ETEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga Micro Cap Fund (CMCMX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMCMX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | -0.11 | +1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | -0.05 | +1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.99 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | -0.15 | +1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.09 | -0.34 | +3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMCMX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | -0.11 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.28 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
CMCMX vs. ETEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCMX drawdown since its inception was -35.11%, smaller than the maximum ETEGX drawdown of -67.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCMX and ETEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMCMX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.11% | -67.58% | +32.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.58% | -13.05% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.93% | -19.98% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -10.84% | +8.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.91% | -22.77% | +10.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.30% | 5.76% | +0.54% |
Volatility
CMCMX vs. ETEGX - Volatility Comparison
Conestoga Micro Cap Fund (CMCMX) has a higher volatility of 6.98% compared to Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) at 4.46%. This indicates that CMCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMCMX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.98% | 4.46% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.75% | 11.06% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 16.05% | +6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 18.77% | +6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 19.85% | +5.54% |
CMCMX vs. ETEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMCMX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ETEGX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMCMX vs. ETEGX - Dividend Comparison
CMCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than ETEGX's 8.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCMX Conestoga Micro Cap Fund | 0.98% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 8.15% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMCMX and ETEGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMCMX has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to ETEGX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCMX dropped -35.11% vs ETEGX's -67.58%.
CMCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMCMX and ETEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer