CMCMX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Conestoga Micro Cap Fund (CMCMX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).

CMCMX is managed by Conestoga Capital Advisors. It was launched on Dec 17, 2021. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.

Performance

CMCMX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conestoga Micro Cap Fund (CMCMX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMCMX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CMCMX Conestoga Micro Cap Fund	-10.23%	16.41%	13.03%	-2.75%	3.42%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund	-5.35%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-6.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCMX achieves a -10.23% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's -5.35% return.

CMCMX

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -9.14%
• YTD: -10.23%
• 6M: -11.85%
• 1Y: 13.92%
• 3Y*: 3.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCNTX

• 1D: 3.52%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: -5.35%
• 6M: -2.60%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: 13.21%
• 10Y*: 16.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMCMX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMCMX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

CMCMX

Conestoga Micro Cap Fund

FCNTX

Fidelity Contrafund Fund

Return for Risk

CMCMX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCMX

CMCMX Risk / Return Rank: 21
CMCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CMCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CMCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CMCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CMCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCMX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga Micro Cap Fund (CMCMX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMCMX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	1.01	-0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	1.56	-0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.22	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	1.79	-1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.97	6.87	-4.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMCMX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCMX and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMCMX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54	1.01	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.76	-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between CMCMX and FCNTX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CMCMX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

CMCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than FCNTX's 4.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMCMX Conestoga Micro Cap Fund	1.15%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund	4.93%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%

Drawdowns

CMCMX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCMX drawdown since its inception was -35.11%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCMX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMCMX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.11%	-49.19%	+14.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.58%	-11.30%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.58%	-8.18%	-8.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.10%	-8.18%	-3.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.46%	2.95%	+2.51%

Volatility

CMCMX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Conestoga Micro Cap Fund (CMCMX) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 6.51%. This indicates that CMCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMCMX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.70%	6.51%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.76%	11.12%	+4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.34%	19.95%	+4.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.49%	19.19%	+6.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.49%	19.64%	+5.85%