CMCMX vs. CCSMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CMCMX (Conestoga Micro Cap Fund) and CCSMX (Conestoga SMid Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - CMCMX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Conestoga Capital Advisors, while CCSMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Conestoga Capital Advisors. Over the past 3 years, CMCMX returned 10.58%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CCSMX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CMCMX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CCSMX.

Performance

CMCMX vs. CCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conestoga Micro Cap Fund (CMCMX) and Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCMX achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than CCSMX's -7.81% return.

CMCMX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -3.99%
• 6M: 8.49%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 1Y: 23.75%
• 3Y*: 10.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.31%

CCSMX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -4.27%
• 6M: -7.85%
• YTD: -7.81%
• 1Y: -11.03%
• 3Y*: 0.28%
• 5Y*: -3.11%
• 10Y*: 8.93%
• ALL TIME*: 6.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
CMCMX Conestoga Micro Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CMCMX vs. CCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CMCMX Conestoga Micro Cap Fund	9.90%	16.41%	13.03%	-2.75%	3.42%
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund	-7.81%	-5.91%	10.44%	25.77%	-2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CMCMX and CCSMX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2022	0.85

The correlation between CMCMX and CCSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CMCMX vs. CCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CMCMX

CMCMX Risk / Return Rank: 23
CMCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CMCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CMCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CMCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CMCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

CCSMX

CCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 1
CCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
CCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CMCMX vs. CCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga Micro Cap Fund (CMCMX) and Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMCMX	CCSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	-0.75	+1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	-1.02	+2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.89	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	-0.70	+1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.06	-1.29	+4.35

CMCMX vs. CCSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the CCSMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCMX and CCSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CMCMX vs. CCSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCMX drawdown since its inception was -35.11%, smaller than the maximum CCSMX drawdown of -37.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCMX and CCSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMCMX	CCSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.11%	-37.34%	+2.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.58%	-18.40%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.22%	-25.00%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.72%	-21.19%	+16.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.54%	-10.34%	-1.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.33%	9.89%	-3.56%

Volatility

CMCMX vs. CCSMX - Volatility Comparison

Conestoga Micro Cap Fund (CMCMX) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX) at 4.75%. This indicates that CMCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMCMX	CCSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	4.75%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	12.37%	+3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.22%	17.13%	+5.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.19%	20.61%	+4.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.19%	20.37%	+4.82%

CMCMX vs. CCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMCMX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CCSMX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMCMX vs. CCSMX - Dividend Comparison

CMCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than CCSMX's 2.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund	2.36%	2.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	1.04%	0.33%
CMCMX Conestoga Micro Cap Fund	0.94%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMCMX and CCSMX in my portfolio?

CMCMX and CCSMX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMCMX or CCSMX?

CMCMX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to CCSMX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCMX dropped -35.11% vs CCSMX's -37.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.