CMCI vs. SLDR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CMCI (VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF) and SLDR (Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMCI is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Composite Total Return Index, while SLDR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CMCI returned 31.73% vs 3.18% for SLDR. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. CMCI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SLDR.

Performance

CMCI vs. SLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCI achieves a 23.39% return, which is significantly higher than SLDR's 0.35% return.

CMCI

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 23.39%
• 6M: 25.02%
• 1Y: 31.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLDR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 0.73%
• 1Y: 3.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMCI vs. SLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF	23.39%	7.90%	7.31%
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF	0.35%	4.60%	0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CMCI and SLDR is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024	-0.21

Return for Risk

CMCI vs. SLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCI

CMCI Risk / Return Rank: 82
CMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
CMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
CMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 84

SLDR

SLDR Risk / Return Rank: 80
SLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCI vs. SLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMCI	SLDR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	2.55	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	4.09	-0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.63	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.68	3.58	+3.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.64	13.89	+3.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMCI vs. SLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the SLDR Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCI and SLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMCI	SLDR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	2.55	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	2.61	-1.66

Drawdowns

CMCI vs. SLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCI drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, which is greater than SLDR's maximum drawdown of -0.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCI and SLDR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMCI	SLDR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.54%	-0.87%	-10.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.03%	-0.87%	-4.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.82%	-0.24%	-2.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-0.13%	-3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	0.22%	+1.69%

Volatility

CMCI vs. SLDR - Volatility Comparison

VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) at 0.40%. This indicates that CMCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMCI	SLDR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	0.40%	+3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.13%	0.78%	+9.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.26%	1.25%	+11.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.63%	1.24%	+11.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.63%	1.24%	+11.39%

CMCI vs. SLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMCI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SLDR's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMCI vs. SLDR - Dividend Comparison

CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than SLDR's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF	8.01%	9.89%	3.93%	1.64%
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF	3.72%	3.80%	0.98%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMCI and SLDR in my portfolio?

CMCI and SLDR have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMCI or SLDR?

CMCI has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to SLDR (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCI dropped -11.54% vs SLDR's -0.87%.

Which ETF is better, CMCI or SLDR?

On 1-year performance, CMCI leads with 31.73% vs 3.18% for SLDR. On fees, SLDR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CMCI or SLDR?

Over the 1-year period, CMCI has performed better with a 31.73% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMCI or SLDR?

SLDR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CMCI or SLDR?

CMCI has the higher dividend yield at 8.01%, compared with 3.72% for SLDR.

What is the main difference between CMCI and SLDR?

CMCI is categorized as Commodities, while SLDR is Government Bonds. CMCI tracks UBS Bloomberg CMCI Composite Total Return Index, while SLDR tracks FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CMCI and 0.12% for SLDR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.