CMCI vs. JAPN

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CMCI (VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF) and JAPN (Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMCI is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Composite Total Return Index, while JAPN is a Japan Equities fund actively managed by Horizon. CMCI is passively managed, while JAPN is actively managed. Over the past year, CMCI returned 28.88% vs -8.89% for JAPN. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CMCI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for JAPN.

Performance

CMCI vs. JAPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCI achieves a 21.78% return, which is significantly higher than JAPN's -2.38% return.

CMCI

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 5.96%
• 6M: 15.17%
• YTD: 21.78%
• 1Y: 28.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.77%

JAPN

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 7.93%
• 6M: 2.43%
• YTD: -2.38%
• 1Y: -8.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF	$2.50K	$2.03K	$12.86K
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF	$244.63K	$159.98K	$135.76K

CMCI vs. JAPN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF	21.78%	6.68%
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF	-2.38%	3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CMCI and JAPN is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

CMCI vs. JAPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CMCI

CMCI Risk / Return Rank: 82
CMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
CMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 73

JAPN

JAPN Risk / Return Rank: 7
JAPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
JAPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
JAPN Omega Ratio Rank: 6
JAPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
JAPN Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CMCI vs. JAPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMCI	JAPN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	-0.37	+2.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	-0.40	+3.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	0.95	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	-0.31	+2.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.12	-0.51	+9.63

CMCI vs. JAPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the JAPN Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCI and JAPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CMCI vs. JAPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCI drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, smaller than the maximum JAPN drawdown of -23.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCI and JAPN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMCI	JAPN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.54%	-23.94%	+12.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.77%	-23.94%	+13.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.08%	-13.16%	+9.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-10.71%	+7.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	14.71%	-11.67%

Volatility

CMCI vs. JAPN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is 3.80%, while Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that CMCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMCI	JAPN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	6.83%	-3.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.52%	16.88%	-6.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.62%	20.20%	-7.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.65%	19.84%	-7.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.65%	19.84%	-7.19%

CMCI vs. JAPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMCI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than JAPN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMCI vs. JAPN - Dividend Comparison

CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than JAPN's 0.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF	8.12%	9.89%	3.93%	1.64%
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF	0.25%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMCI and JAPN in my portfolio?

CMCI and JAPN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMCI or JAPN?

JAPN has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to CMCI (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCI dropped -11.54% vs JAPN's -23.94%.

Which ETF is better, CMCI or JAPN?

On 1-year performance, CMCI leads with 28.88% vs -8.89% for JAPN. On fees, CMCI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CMCI has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CMCI or JAPN?

Over the 1-year period, CMCI has performed better with a 28.88% return vs -8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMCI or JAPN?

CMCI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for JAPN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CMCI or JAPN?

CMCI has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 0.25% for JAPN.

What is the main difference between CMCI and JAPN?

CMCI is categorized as Commodities, while JAPN is Japan Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CMCI and 0.85% for JAPN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.