CMCI vs. COMT
CMCI (VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. CMCI is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. Over the past year, CMCI returned 30.85% vs 47.51% for COMT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMCI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
CMCI vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCI achieves a 23.01% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
CMCI
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 23.01%
- 6M
- 23.83%
- 1Y
- 30.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
CMCI vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF | 23.01% | 7.90% | 5.68% | -2.87% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMCI and COMT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between CMCI and COMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMCI vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
CMCI
COMT
CMCI vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMCI | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.16 | 5.95 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.15 | 14.11 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMCI | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.24 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.20 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
CMCI vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCI drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCI and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMCI | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.54% | -51.89% | +40.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.03% | -8.02% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -4.82% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -24.07% | +20.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 3.38% | -1.46% |
Volatility
CMCI vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is 4.25%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that CMCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMCI | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 7.37% | -3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 18.80% | -8.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 21.29% | -9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 21.06% | -8.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 18.89% | -6.26% |
CMCI vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMCI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMCI vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, more than COMT's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF | 8.04% | 9.89% | 3.93% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMCI and COMT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to CMCI (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCI dropped -11.54% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 30.85% for CMCI. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, CMCI has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 30.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMCI.
CMCI has the higher dividend yield at 8.04%, compared with 5.54% for COMT.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CMCI and 0.48% for COMT.
CMCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMCI and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer