PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMCI vs. COMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMCI vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMCI vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CMCI
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
16.28%7.90%5.68%-2.87%
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
26.39%15.12%5.24%-3.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCI achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 26.39% return.


CMCI

1D
0.25%
1M
6.95%
YTD
16.28%
6M
19.48%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COMB

1D
2.62%
1M
10.97%
YTD
26.39%
6M
33.02%
1Y
33.33%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
13.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMCI vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMCI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CMCI vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCI
CMCI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

COMB
COMB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCI vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMCICOMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.93

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

2.54

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.68

-1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.93

10.11

-3.17

CMCI vs. COMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the COMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCI and COMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMCICOMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.93

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.53

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between CMCI and COMB is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CMCI vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than COMB's 7.16% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCI
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
8.50%9.89%3.93%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
7.16%9.05%2.48%6.57%30.85%15.83%0.07%1.48%0.97%0.20%

Drawdowns

CMCI vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCI drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCI and COMB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCICOMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-33.50%

+21.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-7.69%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

0.00%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-12.24%

+8.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

3.34%

-0.53%

Volatility

CMCI vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is 4.79%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that CMCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMCICOMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

7.94%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

14.06%

-4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

17.38%

-3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

16.57%

-3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

15.07%

-2.46%