CMCI vs. COMB

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CMCI (VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. CMCI is passively managed, while COMB is actively managed. Over the past year, CMCI returned 19.26% vs 22.86% for COMB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMCI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.

Performance

CMCI vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CMCI having a 13.29% return and COMB slightly lower at 12.91%.

CMCI

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -7.94%
• YTD: 13.29%
• 6M: 12.91%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMB

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: -11.53%
• YTD: 12.91%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 22.86%
• 3Y*: 10.90%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMCI vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF	13.29%	7.90%	5.68%	-2.74%
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	12.91%	15.12%	5.24%	-2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CMCI and COMB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023	0.88

The correlation between CMCI and COMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CMCI vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCI

CMCI Risk / Return Rank: 50
CMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 54

COMB

COMB Risk / Return Rank: 40
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 41
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCI vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMCI	COMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.34	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	1.82	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.25	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	1.55	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.35	6.61	+1.75

CMCI vs. COMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the COMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCI and COMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CMCI vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCI drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCI and COMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMCI	COMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.54%	-33.50%	+21.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.77%	-14.84%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.77%	-14.84%	+4.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-12.04%	+8.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	3.47%	-1.16%

Volatility

CMCI vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is 3.20%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that CMCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMCI	COMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	3.91%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.35%	15.35%	-5.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	17.33%	-4.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.63%	16.71%	-4.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.63%	15.15%	-2.52%

CMCI vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMCI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMCI vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.73%, more than COMB's 8.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF	8.73%	9.89%	3.93%	1.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	8.02%	9.05%	2.48%	6.57%	30.85%	15.83%	0.07%	1.48%	0.97%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMCI and COMB in my portfolio?

CMCI and COMB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMCI or COMB?

COMB has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to CMCI (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCI dropped -11.54% vs COMB's -33.50%.

Which ETF is better, CMCI or COMB?

On 1-year performance, COMB leads with 22.86% vs 19.26% for CMCI. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CMCI has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CMCI or COMB?

Over the 1-year period, COMB has performed better with a 22.86% return vs 19.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMCI or COMB?

COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CMCI or COMB?

CMCI has the higher dividend yield at 8.73%, compared with 8.02% for COMB.

What is the main difference between CMCI and COMB?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CMCI and 0.25% for COMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.