PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMCI vs. COM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMCI vs. COM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMCI vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CMCI
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
16.28%7.90%5.68%-2.87%
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
13.56%7.72%5.81%-4.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCI achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly higher than COM's 13.56% return.


CMCI

1D
0.25%
1M
6.95%
YTD
16.28%
6M
19.48%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COM

1D
0.12%
1M
4.71%
YTD
13.56%
6M
17.91%
1Y
16.66%
3Y*
6.68%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMCI vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMCI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CMCI vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCI
CMCI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

COM
COM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
COM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
COM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
COM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCI vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMCICOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.61

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

2.12

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.76

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.93

5.94

+0.99

CMCI vs. COM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the COM Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCI and COM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMCICOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.61

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.72

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between CMCI and COM is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CMCI vs. COM - Dividend Comparison

CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than COM's 2.49% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCI
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
8.50%9.89%3.93%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
2.49%2.99%3.88%3.80%8.59%10.32%0.13%1.09%2.36%0.09%

Drawdowns

CMCI vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCI drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, smaller than the maximum COM drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCI and COM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCICOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-15.95%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-4.33%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-1.17%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-6.37%

+2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.86%

-0.05%

Volatility

CMCI vs. COM - Volatility Comparison

VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) at 3.84%. This indicates that CMCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMCICOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

3.84%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

8.25%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

10.37%

+3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

9.71%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

9.75%

+2.86%