PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMC.DE vs. 3988.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMC.DE vs. 3988.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan Chase & Co (CMC.DE) and Bank of China Limited (3988.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CMC.DE is traded in EUR, while 3988.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3988.HK values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMC.DE achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly lower than 3988.HK's 18.32% return.


CMC.DE

1D
4.35%
1M
0.96%
YTD
-2.54%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
17.07%
3Y*
29.90%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*

3988.HK

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.73%
YTD
18.32%
6M
16.01%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
25.71%
5Y*
21.50%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMC.DE vs. 3988.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CMC.DE
JPMorgan Chase & Co
-2.54%22.97%51.62%27.30%-8.93%39.61%-15.13%5.86%
3988.HK
Bank of China Limited
18.32%7.91%53.61%10.80%16.88%22.55%-21.42%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CMC.DE and 3988.HK is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMC.DE vs. 3988.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMC.DE
CMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

3988.HK
3988.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
3988.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3988.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
3988.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
3988.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
3988.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMC.DE vs. 3988.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Chase & Co (CMC.DE) and Bank of China Limited (3988.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMC.DE3988.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.16

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.35

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

3.20

-0.51

CMC.DE vs. 3988.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the 3988.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMC.DE and 3988.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMC.DE3988.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.90

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

1.14

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.33

+0.23

Drawdowns

CMC.DE vs. 3988.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.77%, smaller than the maximum 3988.HK drawdown of -60.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMC.DE and 3988.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMC.DE3988.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.77%

-60.80%

+19.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.26%

-11.85%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.86%

-15.72%

-12.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.86%

-16.31%

-11.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

-0.91%

-5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.42%

-20.97%

+10.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.34%

4.97%

+1.37%

Volatility

CMC.DE vs. 3988.HK - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Chase & Co (CMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) at 4.92%. This indicates that CMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3988.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMC.DE3988.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

4.92%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

13.08%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.36%

17.85%

+4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.43%

19.42%

+5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.68%

19.65%

+9.03%

Dividends

CMC.DE vs. 3988.HK - Dividend Comparison

CMC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than 3988.HK's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
3988.HK
Bank of China Limited
2.29%8.56%6.53%8.45%9.12%8.46%7.90%6.33%6.26%5.01%6.02%6.86%
CMC.DE
JPMorgan Chase & Co
1.63%1.54%1.59%2.12%2.63%1.91%2.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CMC.DE vs. 3988.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JPMorgan Chase & Co and Bank of China Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CMC.DE values in EUR, 3988.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


CMC.DE and 3988.HK have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMC.DE and 3988.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer