3988.HK vs. 1810.HK

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK).

Performance

3988.HK vs. 1810.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

3988.HK vs. 1810.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
3988.HK Bank of China Limited	13.45%	22.65%	43.37%	14.21%	10.25%	14.66%	-14.78%	4.69%	-8.40%
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	-21.42%	13.42%	122.12%	42.60%	-42.12%	-42.81%	206.59%	-16.56%	-23.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3988.HK achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than 1810.HK's -21.42% return.

3988.HK

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 10.96%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 6M: 21.92%
• 1Y: 14.35%
• 3Y*: 29.06%
• 5Y*: 20.94%
• 10Y*: 12.47%

1810.HK

• 1D: -3.56%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: -21.42%
• 6M: -44.66%
• 1Y: -30.68%
• 3Y*: 36.43%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

3988.HK vs. 1810.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3988.HK

3988.HK Risk / Return Rank: 61
3988.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
3988.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
3988.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 57
3988.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
3988.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 65

1810.HK

1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 10
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 13
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3988.HK vs. 1810.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3988.HK	1810.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	-0.72	+1.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	-0.82	+1.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.89	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	-0.87	+2.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.00	-1.62	+4.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3988.HK vs. 1810.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3988.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3988.HK and 1810.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3988.HK	1810.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	-0.72	+1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.16	0.07	+1.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.18	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between 3988.HK and 1810.HK is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

3988.HK vs. 1810.HK - Dividend Comparison

3988.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, while 1810.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
3988.HK Bank of China Limited	4.97%	8.56%	6.53%	8.45%	9.12%	8.46%	7.90%	6.33%	6.26%	5.01%	6.02%	6.86%
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

3988.HK vs. 1810.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3988.HK drawdown since its inception was -66.11%, smaller than the maximum 1810.HK drawdown of -76.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3988.HK and 1810.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	3988.HK	1810.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.11%	-76.06%	+9.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.61%	-48.66%	+36.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.25%	-71.83%	+54.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-48.66%	+48.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.93%	-41.92%	+21.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	25.96%	-20.67%

Volatility

3988.HK vs. 1810.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) is 4.64%, while Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) has a volatility of 13.65%. This indicates that 3988.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1810.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3988.HK	1810.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	13.65%	-9.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.63%	26.82%	-15.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.24%	43.70%	-23.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.53%	44.02%	-25.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.01%	45.98%	-26.97%

Financials