PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3988.HK vs. HSBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

3988.HK vs. HSBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3988.HK is traded in HKD, while HSBC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HSBC values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3988.HK achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly lower than HSBC's 26.56% return. Over the past 10 years, 3988.HK has underperformed HSBC with an annualized return of 12.94%, while HSBC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.67% annualized return.


3988.HK

1D
-1.31%
1M
0.76%
YTD
18.16%
6M
18.96%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
29.39%
5Y*
21.03%
10Y*
12.94%

HSBC

1D
0.00%
1M
3.96%
YTD
26.56%
6M
25.22%
1Y
64.96%
3Y*
45.67%
5Y*
34.59%
10Y*
18.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3988.HK vs. HSBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
3988.HK
Bank of China Limited
18.16%22.96%42.97%14.21%10.25%14.66%-14.78%4.69%-6.88%17.45%
HSBC
HSBC Holdings plc
26.56%68.23%33.79%39.43%7.97%21.42%-32.01%0.90%-15.87%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between 3988.HK and HSBC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between 3988.HK and HSBC has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3988.HK vs. HSBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3988.HK
3988.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
3988.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3988.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
3988.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
3988.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
3988.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HSBC
HSBC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HSBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3988.HK vs. HSBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3988.HKHSBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.42

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

4.04

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.14

14.18

-11.05

3988.HK vs. HSBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3988.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the HSBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3988.HK and HSBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3988.HK vs. HSBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3988.HK drawdown since its inception was -65.26%, smaller than the maximum HSBC drawdown of -74.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3988.HK and HSBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3988.HKHSBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.26%

-74.45%

+9.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-16.18%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.24%

-21.84%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

-31.31%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-62.59%

+22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-0.93%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-29.55%

+9.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

4.59%

+0.38%

Volatility

3988.HK vs. HSBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) is 5.87%, while HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that 3988.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3988.HKHSBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

9.09%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

22.22%

-9.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

27.01%

-9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

25.91%

-7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

25.39%

-6.43%

Dividends

3988.HK vs. HSBC - Dividend Comparison

3988.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than HSBC's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
3988.HK
Bank of China Limited
2.29%8.56%6.53%8.45%9.12%8.46%7.90%6.33%6.26%5.01%6.02%6.96%
HSBC
HSBC Holdings plc
4.00%4.19%8.29%6.54%4.33%3.65%4.05%6.52%6.20%4.94%6.35%6.33%

Financials

3988.HK vs. HSBC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of China Limited and HSBC Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 3988.HK values in HKD, HSBC values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


3988.HK and HSBC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3988.HK and HSBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer