CMBO vs. TUSB
CMBO (Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF) and TUSB (Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMBO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TUSB.
Performance
CMBO vs. TUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMBO achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than TUSB's 1.77% return.
CMBO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUSB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMBO vs. TUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMBO Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF | 1.63% | 0.52% |
TUSB Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.77% | 0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMBO and TUSB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMBO vs. TUSB — Risk / Return Rank
CMBO
TUSB
CMBO vs. TUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMBO | TUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 9.91 | 3.71 | +6.20 |
Drawdowns
CMBO vs. TUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMBO drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum TUSB drawdown of -0.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBO and TUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMBO | TUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -0.51% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.14% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.06% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility
CMBO vs. TUSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMBO | TUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38% | 0.92% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 1.24% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 1.24% | -0.86% |
CMBO vs. TUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMBO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TUSB's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CMBO vs. TUSB - Dividend Comparison
CMBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CMBO Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUSB Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.26% | 3.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMBO and TUSB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMBO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMBO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TUSB.
TUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.00% for CMBO.
They also come from different issuers: Wayfinder and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMBO and 0.20% for TUSB.
Find the right allocation for CMBO and TUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer