PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMBO vs. TUSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMBO vs. TUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMBO achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than TUSB's 1.77% return.


CMBO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TUSB

1D
0.02%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMBO vs. TUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CMBO and TUSB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMBO vs. TUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMBO

TUSB
TUSB Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMBO vs. TUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CMBO vs. TUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMBOTUSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

9.91

3.71

+6.20

Drawdowns

CMBO vs. TUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMBO drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum TUSB drawdown of -0.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBO and TUSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMBOTUSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-0.51%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.06%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

Volatility

CMBO vs. TUSB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMBOTUSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38%

0.92%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.38%

1.24%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.38%

1.24%

-0.86%

CMBO vs. TUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMBO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TUSB's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMBO vs. TUSB - Dividend Comparison

CMBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CMBO and TUSB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMBO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMBO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TUSB.

TUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.00% for CMBO.

They also come from different issuers: Wayfinder and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMBO and 0.20% for TUSB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMBO and TUSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer