PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMB1.L vs. GOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMB1.L vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CMB1.L is traded in GBp, while GOOG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GOOG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMB1.L having a 17.38% return and GOOG slightly higher at 17.66%. Over the past 10 years, CMB1.L has underperformed GOOG with an annualized return of 16.95%, while GOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 27.63% annualized return.


CMB1.L

1D
0.88%
1M
6.08%
YTD
17.38%
6M
18.38%
1Y
39.41%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
20.47%
10Y*
16.95%

GOOG

1D
2.43%
1M
-7.24%
YTD
17.66%
6M
18.51%
1Y
111.79%
3Y*
41.86%
5Y*
25.17%
10Y*
27.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMB1.L vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
17.38%43.83%13.25%30.68%-3.56%18.29%1.52%24.83%-13.79%22.48%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
17.66%53.63%37.99%50.89%-31.38%66.73%27.18%24.19%4.84%23.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CMB1.L and GOOG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2014

0.26

The correlation between CMB1.L and GOOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMB1.L vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMB1.L vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMB1.LGOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.65

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

6.20

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

20.82

-6.92

CMB1.L vs. GOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is lower than the GOOG Sharpe Ratio of 4.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMB1.L and GOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMB1.L vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMB1.L drawdown since its inception was -56.05%, which is greater than GOOG's maximum drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMB1.L and GOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMB1.LGOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.05%

-36.13%

-19.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-18.15%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.62%

-32.62%

+17.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-36.13%

+11.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

-36.13%

-0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.60%

+7.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.23%

-7.78%

-7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

5.39%

-2.57%

Volatility

CMB1.L vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) is 3.86%, while Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that CMB1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMB1.LGOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

7.71%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

19.22%

-6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

27.83%

-12.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.02%

30.30%

-12.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.25%

29.13%

-8.88%

Dividends

CMB1.L vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison

CMB1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.23%0.26%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMB1.L and GOOG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMB1.L and GOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer