CM vs. MTSI
CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) and MTSI (MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. CM operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while MTSI operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CM returned 17.15%/yr vs 27.43%/yr for MTSI. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CM vs. MTSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CM achieves a 24.28% return, which is significantly lower than MTSI's 128.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CM has underperformed MTSI with an annualized return of 17.15%, while MTSI has yielded a comparatively higher 27.43% annualized return.
CM
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- 24.28%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 67.98%
- 3Y*
- 43.12%
- 5Y*
- 20.06%
- 10Y*
- 17.15%
MTSI
- 1D
- 6.62%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 128.52%
- 6M
- 124.41%
- 1Y
- 185.72%
- 3Y*
- 85.93%
- 5Y*
- 46.16%
- 10Y*
- 27.43%
CM vs. MTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 24.28% | 49.02% | 37.83% | 27.23% | -25.71% | 42.29% | 9.25% | 19.22% | -19.75% | 26.58% |
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 128.52% | 31.85% | 39.76% | 47.59% | -19.57% | 42.26% | 106.92% | 83.32% | -55.41% | -29.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CM and MTSI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2012 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
CM:
$75.95B
MTSI:
$30.19B
CM:
CA$12.14
MTSI:
$2.33
CM:
13.01
MTSI:
168.14
CM:
1.61
MTSI:
0.25
CM:
2.07
MTSI:
27.68
CM:
1.84
MTSI:
21.30
CM:
CA$61.84B
MTSI:
$1.07B
CM:
CA$28.74B
MTSI:
$594.25M
CM:
CA$13.01B
MTSI:
$245.21M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CM vs. MTSI — Risk / Return Rank
CM
MTSI
CM vs. MTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CM | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.50 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.43 | 9.76 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.18 | 24.96 | +0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CM vs. MTSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CM drawdown since its inception was -71.70%, smaller than the maximum MTSI drawdown of -80.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM and MTSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CM | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.70% | -80.78% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -19.74% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.47% | -41.09% | +21.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.61% | -44.86% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.82% | -80.78% | +32.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -4.46% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.65% | -26.18% | +11.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 7.70% | -4.95% |
Volatility
CM vs. MTSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) is 7.78%, while MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) has a volatility of 20.95%. This indicates that CM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CM | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 20.95% | -13.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 40.71% | -24.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.03% | 51.36% | -32.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 43.84% | -22.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 52.45% | -29.84% |
Dividends
CM vs. MTSI - Dividend Comparison
CM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while MTSI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 2.65% | 3.17% | 4.21% | 5.88% | 7.77% | 4.08% | 5.06% | 6.47% | 5.48% | 5.28% | 5.93% | 6.71% |
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CM vs. MTSI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CM vs. MTSI - Profitability Comparison
CM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
MTSI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.
CM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
MTSI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
CM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.
MTSI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CM and MTSI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTSI has higher volatility (20.95%) compared to CM (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CM dropped -71.70% vs MTSI's -80.78%.
MTSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 3.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CM and MTSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer