CM vs. MPWR
CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) and MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. CM operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while MPWR operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CM returned 18.55%/yr vs 36.06%/yr for MPWR. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CM vs. MPWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CM achieves a 32.80% return, which is significantly lower than MPWR's 57.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CM has underperformed MPWR with an annualized return of 18.55%, while MPWR has yielded a comparatively higher 36.06% annualized return.
CM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 30.24%
- YTD
- 32.80%
- 1Y
- 71.34%
- 3Y*
- 46.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 18.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.80%
MPWR
- 1D
- 8.35%
- 1M
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 27.30%
- YTD
- 57.89%
- 1Y
- 101.90%
- 3Y*
- 38.39%
- 5Y*
- 26.91%
- 10Y*
- 36.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 27.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $112.13M | $139.31M | $149.20M | |
| $1.37B | $1.27B | $1.35B |
CM vs. MPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 32.80% | 49.02% | 37.83% | 27.23% | -25.71% | 42.29% | 9.25% | 19.22% | -19.75% | 26.58% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 57.89% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -27.78% | 35.49% | 107.49% | 54.80% | 4.49% | 38.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CM and MPWR is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004 | 0.33 |
The correlation between CM and MPWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CM:
$109.85B
MPWR:
$70.06B
CM:
CA$12.82
MPWR:
$16.33
CM:
12.96
MPWR:
87.33
CM:
1.60
MPWR:
1.10
CM:
2.06
MPWR:
21.32
CM:
1.94
MPWR:
18.03
CM:
CA$61.84B
MPWR:
$3.27B
CM:
CA$28.74B
MPWR:
$1.81B
CM:
CA$13.01B
MPWR:
$1.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CM vs. MPWR — Risk / Return Rank
CM
MPWR
CM vs. MPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CM | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.30 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.65 | 3.94 | +2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.12 | 9.44 | +16.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CM vs. MPWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CM drawdown since its inception was -71.70%, roughly equal to the maximum MPWR drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM and MPWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CM | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.70% | -72.27% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -25.99% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.35% | -51.65% | +34.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.61% | -51.65% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.82% | -51.65% | +3.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -15.49% | +13.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.59% | -17.71% | +3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 10.83% | -8.09% |
Volatility
CM vs. MPWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) is 6.74%, while Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a volatility of 18.57%. This indicates that CM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CM | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 18.57% | -11.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | 44.07% | -27.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.84% | 54.05% | -34.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 54.63% | -33.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 47.86% | -25.22% |
Dividends
CM vs. MPWR - Dividend Comparison
CM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than MPWR's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 2.54% | 3.17% | 4.21% | 5.88% | 7.77% | 4.08% | 5.06% | 6.47% | 5.48% | 5.28% | 5.93% | 6.71% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
Financials
CM vs. MPWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CM vs. MPWR - Profitability Comparison
CM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
MPWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 541.07M and revenue of 980.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.
CM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
MPWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 303.89M and revenue of 980.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
CM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.
MPWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 257.30M and revenue of 980.64M, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CM and MPWR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MPWR has higher volatility (18.57%) compared to CM (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CM dropped -71.70% vs MPWR's -72.27%.
CM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CM and MPWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer