CLX vs. PDBC
CLX (The Clorox Company) is a stock, while PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) is Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, CLX returned -0.26%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for PDBC. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CLX vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLX achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 28.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CLX has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of -0.26%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.21% annualized return.
CLX
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- -9.14%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- -18.71%
- 3Y*
- -10.45%
- 5Y*
- -8.88%
- 10Y*
- -0.26%
PDBC
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 23.17%
- YTD
- 28.00%
- 1Y
- 32.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
CLX vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLX The Clorox Company | 0.23% | -35.59% | 17.72% | 4.99% | -17.00% | -11.50% | 34.46% | 2.23% | 6.55% | 27.14% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 28.00% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLX and PDBC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | -0.05 |
The correlation between CLX and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLX vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
CLX
PDBC
CLX vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Clorox Company (CLX) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.29 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 1.96 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 6.73 | -7.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLX vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLX drawdown since its inception was -56.34%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLX and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.34% | -49.52% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.52% | -16.55% | -14.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.11% | -16.55% | -29.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.11% | -27.63% | -18.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.34% | -40.73% | -15.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.96% | -10.31% | -39.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.51% | -23.09% | +9.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.00% | 4.80% | +12.20% |
Volatility
CLX vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The Clorox Company (CLX) has a higher volatility of 10.44% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 6.25%. This indicates that CLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.44% | 6.25% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.86% | 16.80% | +8.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.21% | 18.91% | +10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.38% | 19.24% | +7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 17.76% | +6.93% |
Dividends
CLX vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
CLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than PDBC's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLX The Clorox Company | 5.02% | 4.88% | 2.98% | 3.34% | 3.33% | 2.60% | 2.15% | 2.63% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 2.62% | 2.38% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.00% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLX and PDBC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLX has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to PDBC (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLX dropped -56.34% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLX and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer