CLTC.DE vs. ZCSH
CLTC.DE (CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds. CLTC.DE is actively managed, while ZCSH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CLTC.DE returned -23.64%/yr vs 148.41%/yr for ZCSH. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLTC.DE charges 1.50%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.
Performance
CLTC.DE vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CLTC.DE is traded in EUR, while ZCSH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ZCSH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLTC.DE achieves a -38.45% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's -9.76% return.
CLTC.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -16.19%
- YTD
- -38.45%
- 6M
- -40.84%
- 1Y
- -50.13%
- 3Y*
- -23.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -23.95%
- YTD
- -9.76%
- 6M
- -10.67%
- 1Y
- 599.71%
- 3Y*
- 148.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLTC.DE vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLTC.DE CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR | -38.45% | -33.53% | 39.59% | 9.00% | -53.04% | -16.79% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | -9.76% | 381.90% | 109.92% | 60.93% | -85.45% | -47.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLTC.DE and ZCSH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2021 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLTC.DE vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank
CLTC.DE
ZCSH
CLTC.DE vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLTC.DE | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.41 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 8.62 | -9.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 16.55 | -17.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLTC.DE vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.88%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLTC.DE and ZCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLTC.DE | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.88% | -93.09% | +8.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.63% | -70.21% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.69% | -71.67% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.86% | -46.73% | -38.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.42% | -73.15% | +7.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.63% | 36.60% | +3.03% |
Volatility
CLTC.DE vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) is 11.65%, while Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a volatility of 66.27%. This indicates that CLTC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLTC.DE | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.65% | 66.27% | -54.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.99% | 104.79% | -68.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.87% | 171.66% | -110.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.57% | 137.70% | -62.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.57% | 137.70% | -62.13% |
CLTC.DE vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLTC.DE has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLTC.DE vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLTC.DE nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLTC.DE and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLTC.DE is cheaper at 1.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLTC.DE is cheaper with a 1.50% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CLTC.DE and 2.50% for ZCSH.
Find the right allocation for CLTC.DE and ZCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer