PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLTC.DE vs. CCHA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLTC.DE vs. CCHA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and CoinShares Physical Chainlink ETP (CCHA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLTC.DE achieves a -38.45% return, which is significantly lower than CCHA.DE's -34.79% return.


CLTC.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
-13.93%
YTD
-38.45%
6M
-43.65%
1Y
-48.83%
3Y*
-23.64%
5Y*
10Y*

CCHA.DE

1D
-3.98%
1M
-16.44%
YTD
-34.79%
6M
-44.38%
1Y
-44.75%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLTC.DE vs. CCHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CLTC.DE
CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR
-38.45%-33.53%39.59%9.00%-35.32%
CCHA.DE
CoinShares Physical Chainlink ETP
-34.79%-48.45%37.05%178.07%-51.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CLTC.DE and CCHA.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022

0.69

The correlation between CLTC.DE and CCHA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLTC.DE vs. CCHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLTC.DE
CLTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CCHA.DE
CCHA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCHA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCHA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CCHA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCHA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLTC.DE vs. CCHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and CoinShares Physical Chainlink ETP (CCHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLTC.DECCHA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.93

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

-0.64

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-0.96

-0.28

CLTC.DE vs. CCHA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the CCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLTC.DE and CCHA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLTC.DECCHA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

-0.62

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

-0.13

-0.18

Drawdowns

CLTC.DE vs. CCHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.88%, which is greater than CCHA.DE's maximum drawdown of -75.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLTC.DE and CCHA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLTC.DECCHA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.88%

-75.80%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.63%

-69.64%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.69%

-75.80%

+5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.86%

-75.80%

-9.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.45%

-39.26%

-26.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.63%

46.73%

-7.10%

Volatility

CLTC.DE vs. CCHA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) is 11.65%, while CoinShares Physical Chainlink ETP (CCHA.DE) has a volatility of 14.62%. This indicates that CLTC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCHA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLTC.DECCHA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.65%

14.62%

-2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.99%

44.07%

-8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.87%

72.25%

-11.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.60%

85.39%

-9.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.60%

85.39%

-9.79%

CLTC.DE vs. CCHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLTC.DE and CCHA.DE have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

CLTC.DE vs. CCHA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLTC.DE nor CCHA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CLTC.DE and CCHA.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLTC.DE and CCHA.DE have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLTC.DE and CCHA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer