CLTC.DE vs. CBXO
CLTC.DE (CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - CLTC.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLTC.DE charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
CLTC.DE vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CLTC.DE is traded in EUR, while CBXO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CBXO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLTC.DE achieves a -38.45% return, which is significantly lower than CBXO's -2.62% return.
CLTC.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -13.93%
- YTD
- -38.45%
- 6M
- -43.65%
- 1Y
- -48.83%
- 3Y*
- -23.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- -2.62%
- 6M
- -4.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLTC.DE vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLTC.DE CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR | -38.45% | -33.74% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -2.62% | -8.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLTC.DE and CBXO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLTC.DE vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
CLTC.DE
CBXO
CLTC.DE vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLTC.DE | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLTC.DE | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | -1.86 | +1.55 |
Drawdowns
CLTC.DE vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.88%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -12.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLTC.DE and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLTC.DE | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.88% | -12.93% | -71.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.86% | -11.31% | -73.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.45% | -8.81% | -56.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.63% | — | — |
Volatility
CLTC.DE vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLTC.DE | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.87% | 8.90% | +51.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.60% | 8.90% | +66.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.60% | 8.90% | +66.70% |
CLTC.DE vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLTC.DE has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLTC.DE vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
CLTC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% |
CLTC.DE CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLTC.DE and CBXO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBXO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBXO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CLTC.DE.
CLTC.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CLTC.DE and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for CLTC.DE and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer