PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLTC.DE vs. BTCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLTC.DE vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLTC.DE is traded in EUR, while BTCZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTCZ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLTC.DE achieves a -38.45% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 41.50% return.


CLTC.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
-13.93%
YTD
-38.45%
6M
-43.65%
1Y
-48.83%
3Y*
-23.64%
5Y*
10Y*

BTCZ

1D
5.41%
1M
61.56%
YTD
41.50%
6M
53.82%
1Y
57.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLTC.DE vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CLTC.DE
CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR
-38.45%-33.53%57.67%
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
41.50%-37.53%-75.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CLTC.DE and BTCZ is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

-0.51

The correlation between CLTC.DE and BTCZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.66 (1 year) to -0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLTC.DE vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLTC.DE
CLTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLTC.DE vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLTC.DEBTCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.17

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

1.18

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

2.21

-3.45

CLTC.DE vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLTC.DE and BTCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLTC.DEBTCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

0.66

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

-0.57

+0.26

Drawdowns

CLTC.DE vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.88%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLTC.DE and BTCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLTC.DEBTCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.88%

-91.64%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.63%

-49.04%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.86%

-78.72%

-6.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.45%

-74.14%

+8.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.63%

26.24%

+13.39%

Volatility

CLTC.DE vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) is 11.65%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 17.42%. This indicates that CLTC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLTC.DEBTCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.65%

17.42%

-5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.99%

67.78%

-31.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.87%

88.54%

-27.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.60%

97.72%

-22.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.60%

97.72%

-22.12%

CLTC.DE vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLTC.DE has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLTC.DE vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

CLTC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%
CLTC.DE
CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLTC.DE and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CLTC.DE.

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CLTC.DE and 0.95% for BTCZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLTC.DE and BTCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer