CLTC.DE vs. BLOX
CLTC.DE (CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR) and BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLTC.DE charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BLOX.
Performance
CLTC.DE vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CLTC.DE is traded in EUR, while BLOX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BLOX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLTC.DE achieves a -38.45% return, which is significantly lower than BLOX's 16.91% return.
CLTC.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -13.93%
- YTD
- -38.45%
- 6M
- -43.65%
- 1Y
- -48.83%
- 3Y*
- -23.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOX
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- 16.91%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLTC.DE vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLTC.DE CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR | -38.45% | -10.09% |
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 16.91% | 6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLTC.DE and BLOX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLTC.DE vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank
CLTC.DE
BLOX
CLTC.DE vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLTC.DE | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLTC.DE | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | 0.49 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
CLTC.DE vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.88%, which is greater than BLOX's maximum drawdown of -46.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLTC.DE and BLOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLTC.DE | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.88% | -46.61% | -38.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.86% | -20.42% | -64.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.45% | -18.94% | -46.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.63% | — | — |
Volatility
CLTC.DE vs. BLOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLTC.DE | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.87% | 52.83% | +8.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.60% | 52.83% | +22.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.60% | 52.83% | +22.77% |
CLTC.DE vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLTC.DE has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLTC.DE vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison
CLTC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 37.11% | 22.69% |
CLTC.DE CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLTC.DE and BLOX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLOX is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLOX is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CLTC.DE.
They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CLTC.DE and 1.03% for BLOX.
Find the right allocation for CLTC.DE and BLOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer