CLTC.DE vs. BFOC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CLTC.DE (CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - CLTC.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLTC.DE charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.

Performance

CLTC.DE vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CLTC.DE is traded in EUR, while BFOC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BFOC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLTC.DE achieves a -38.45% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -6.33% return.

CLTC.DE

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -13.93%
• YTD: -38.45%
• 6M: -43.65%
• 1Y: -48.83%
• 3Y*: -23.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFOC

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: -6.33%
• 6M: -8.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLTC.DE vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLTC.DE CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR	-38.45%	-30.68%
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	-6.33%	-9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CLTC.DE and BFOC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

CLTC.DE vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLTC.DE

CLTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3
CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CLTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CLTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CLTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CLTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLTC.DE vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLTC.DE	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.80	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLTC.DE	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	-1.67	+1.36

Drawdowns

CLTC.DE vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.88%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLTC.DE and BFOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLTC.DE	BFOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.88%	-18.52%	-66.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-70.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.86%	-17.69%	-67.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.45%	-12.45%	-53.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLTC.DE	BFOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.87%	13.40%	+47.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.60%	13.40%	+62.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.60%	13.40%	+62.20%

CLTC.DE vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLTC.DE has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLTC.DE vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLTC.DE nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLTC.DE and BFOC in my portfolio?

CLTC.DE and BFOC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLTC.DE or BFOC?

On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLTC.DE or BFOC?

BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CLTC.DE.

What is the main difference between CLTC.DE and BFOC?

CLTC.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CLTC.DE and 0.90% for BFOC.