PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSX vs. SBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLSX vs. SBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSX achieves a 60.09% return, which is significantly higher than SBU's 40.54% return.


CLSX

1D
-11.28%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
60.09%
6M
24.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBU

1D
4.52%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
40.54%
6M
39.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSX vs. SBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CLSX
Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF
60.09%-27.28%
SBU
Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF
40.54%-6.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSX and SBU is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSX vs. SBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLSX vs. SBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLSX vs. SBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSX drawdown since its inception was -93.16%, which is greater than SBU's maximum drawdown of -28.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSX and SBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSXSBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.16%

-28.10%

-65.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.32%

-7.63%

-69.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.47%

-7.39%

-62.08%

Volatility

CLSX vs. SBU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSXSBUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

190.49%

59.33%

+131.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

190.49%

59.33%

+131.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

190.49%

59.33%

+131.16%

CLSX vs. SBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SBU's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLSX vs. SBU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSX nor SBU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSX and SBU have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CLSX.

CLSX and SBU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CLSX and 0.75% for SBU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSX and SBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer