PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSX vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLSX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLSX

1D
-11.28%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
60.09%
6M
24.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
-0.64%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CLSX and MUU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLSX vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLSX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSX drawdown since its inception was -93.16%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSX and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSXMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.16%

-26.63%

-66.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.32%

-26.63%

-50.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.47%

-12.91%

-56.56%

Volatility

CLSX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSXMUUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

190.49%

263.57%

-73.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

190.49%

263.57%

-73.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

190.49%

263.57%

-73.08%

CLSX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLSX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

CLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLSX and MUU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CLSX.

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for CLSX.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CLSX and 1.01% for MUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSX and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer