CLSX vs. MUU
CLSX (Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLSX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.
Performance
CLSX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSX achieves a 78.75% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 798.37% return.
CLSX
- 1D
- -9.03%
- 1M
- 47.38%
- YTD
- 78.75%
- 6M
- -25.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -15.35%
- 1M
- 121.05%
- YTD
- 798.37%
- 6M
- 1,279.44%
- 1Y
- 5,396.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLSX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF | 78.75% | -45.19% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 798.37% | 179.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSX and MUU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSX vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
CLSX
MUU
CLSX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLSX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 41.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 5.91 | -5.92 |
Drawdowns
CLSX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSX drawdown since its inception was -93.16%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSX and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.16% | -75.07% | -18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.67% | -15.35% | -59.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -23.42% | -45.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.54% | — |
Volatility
CLSX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 56.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 106.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 192.48% | 132.77% | +59.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 192.48% | 134.14% | +58.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 192.48% | 134.14% | +58.34% |
CLSX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
CLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.54% | 4.27% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSX and MUU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CLSX.
MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for CLSX.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CLSX and 1.06% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for CLSX and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer