CLSPX vs. SSMGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX).
CLSPX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 20, 1985. SSMGX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Jul 1, 1994.
Performance
CLSPX vs. SSMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLSPX vs. SSMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund | -7.47% | 15.16% | 23.97% | 25.25% | -31.25% | 16.39% | 35.43% | 35.25% | -5.22% | 22.86% |
SSMGX SIT Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.24% | 9.40% | 13.42% | 16.93% | -25.59% | 15.80% | 35.97% | 29.19% | -10.88% | 15.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSPX achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly lower than SSMGX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CLSPX has outperformed SSMGX with an annualized return of 11.32%, while SSMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.55% annualized return.
CLSPX
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -7.47%
- 6M
- -10.69%
- 1Y
- 18.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
SSMGX
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -9.50%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLSPX vs. SSMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than SSMGX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CLSPX vs. SSMGX — Risk / Return Rank
CLSPX
SSMGX
CLSPX vs. SSMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLSPX | SSMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 1.02 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.54 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.56 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 6.49 | -2.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLSPX | SSMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 1.02 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.15 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.45 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.35 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSPX and SSMGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CLSPX vs. SSMGX - Dividend Comparison
CLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.96%, more than SSMGX's 5.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund | 12.96% | 11.99% | 12.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.10% | 15.38% | 8.30% | 26.41% | 13.16% | 6.15% | 17.11% |
SSMGX SIT Small Cap Growth Fund | 5.41% | 5.48% | 4.69% | 3.13% | 1.73% | 15.89% | 3.44% | 3.14% | 9.80% | 6.81% | 0.17% | 10.68% |
Drawdowns
CLSPX vs. SSMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSPX drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, roughly equal to the maximum SSMGX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSPX and SSMGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSPX | SSMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.54% | -65.75% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -13.50% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.35% | -34.37% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | -35.72% | -7.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.64% | -10.05% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.30% | -19.15% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 3.24% | +0.83% |
Volatility
CLSPX vs. SSMGX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) at 7.29%. This indicates that CLSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLSPX | SSMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.39% | 7.29% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.39% | 13.65% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.56% | 22.81% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 21.77% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 21.51% | +1.13% |