PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSPX vs. SMCWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLSPX vs. SMCWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSPX achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than SMCWX's 12.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CLSPX has outperformed SMCWX with an annualized return of 14.05%, while SMCWX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.


CLSPX

1D
0.21%
1M
9.79%
YTD
19.07%
6M
18.10%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
23.18%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
14.05%

SMCWX

1D
0.63%
1M
2.81%
YTD
12.78%
6M
13.38%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSPX vs. SMCWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLSPX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund
19.07%15.16%23.97%25.25%-31.25%16.39%35.43%35.25%-5.22%22.86%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
12.78%14.07%2.33%18.86%-29.90%10.14%37.46%30.79%-9.75%26.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSPX and SMCWX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 1990

0.86

The correlation between CLSPX and SMCWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSPX vs. SMCWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSPX
CLSPX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CLSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCWX
SMCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SMCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSPX vs. SMCWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSPXSMCWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.23

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

8.94

-0.60

CLSPX vs. SMCWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the SMCWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSPX and SMCWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSPXSMCWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.67

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.12

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.56

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.59

-0.15

Drawdowns

CLSPX vs. SMCWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSPX drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, which is greater than SMCWX's maximum drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSPX and SMCWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSPXSMCWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.54%

-62.46%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.64%

-11.83%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-21.40%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.35%

-39.79%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.35%

-39.79%

-3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-14.92%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

2.95%

+0.90%

Volatility

CLSPX vs. SMCWX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) at 5.09%. This indicates that CLSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSPXSMCWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

5.09%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.86%

12.83%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.25%

15.82%

+5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.07%

18.20%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

17.90%

+4.94%

CLSPX vs. SMCWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCWX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLSPX vs. SMCWX - Dividend Comparison

CLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%, more than SMCWX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLSPX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund
10.07%11.99%12.87%0.00%0.00%21.10%15.38%8.30%26.41%13.16%6.15%17.11%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
4.30%4.84%0.60%0.64%0.00%9.24%1.60%4.24%7.06%4.48%0.35%6.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSPX and SMCWX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLSPX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to SMCWX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSPX dropped -68.54% vs SMCWX's -62.46%.

SMCWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSPX and SMCWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer