CLSPX vs. FMDGX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CLSPX (Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CLSPX returned 6.94%/yr vs 4.37%/yr for FMDGX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CLSPX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.

Performance

CLSPX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSPX achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's 0.31% return.

CLSPX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -5.51%
• 6M: 10.11%
• YTD: 12.95%
• 1Y: 14.77%
• 3Y*: 17.89%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: 13.38%
• ALL TIME*: 11.02%

FMDGX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -4.14%
• 6M: 0.83%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 1Y: -1.05%
• 3Y*: 12.08%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CLSPX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund	12.95%	15.16%	23.97%	25.25%	-31.25%	16.39%	35.43%	4.79%
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund	0.31%	8.60%	22.03%	25.79%	-26.67%	12.67%	34.84%	4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSPX and FMDGX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.96

The correlation between CLSPX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CLSPX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLSPX

CLSPX Risk / Return Rank: 16
CLSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CLSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CLSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CLSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CLSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FMDGX

FMDGX Risk / Return Rank: 3
FMDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FMDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FMDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FMDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FMDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLSPX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLSPX	FMDGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	-0.15	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	-0.10	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.99	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	-0.18	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.04	-0.51	+3.55

CLSPX vs. FMDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the FMDGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSPX and FMDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLSPX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSPX drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSPX and FMDGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSPX	FMDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.54%	-38.59%	-29.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.64%	-14.75%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.36%	-25.30%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.35%	-38.59%	-4.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.88%	-6.46%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.19%	-11.02%	-5.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.28%	5.30%	-1.02%

Volatility

CLSPX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 5.09%. This indicates that CLSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLSPX	FMDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.47%	5.09%	+2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.99%	13.99%	+5.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.08%	17.60%	+5.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.39%	22.53%	+2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.98%	24.22%	-1.24%

CLSPX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSPX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison

CLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, more than FMDGX's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund	10.62%	11.99%	12.87%	0.00%	0.00%	21.10%	15.38%	8.30%	26.41%	13.16%	6.15%	17.11%
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund	1.85%	1.85%	0.47%	0.63%	0.81%	6.43%	0.36%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSPX and FMDGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, CLSPX and FMDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CLSPX or FMDGX?

CLSPX has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to FMDGX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSPX dropped -68.54% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.