CLSA.TO vs. HAL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLSA.TO (Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF) and HAL.TO (Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CLSA.TO returned 70.18% vs 42.29% for HAL.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLSA.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for HAL.TO.

Performance

CLSA.TO vs. HAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSA.TO achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly higher than HAL.TO's 17.28% return.

CLSA.TO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 7.37%
• YTD: 20.72%
• 6M: 30.07%
• 1Y: 70.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HAL.TO

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 17.28%
• 6M: 20.97%
• 1Y: 42.29%
• 3Y*: 21.26%
• 5Y*: 14.92%
• 10Y*: 11.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSA.TO vs. HAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	20.72%	56.35%
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF	17.28%	27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSA.TO and HAL.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025	0.47

The correlation between CLSA.TO and HAL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CLSA.TO vs. HAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSA.TO

CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

HAL.TO

HAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
HAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSA.TO vs. HAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLSA.TO	HAL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.87	4.46	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.65	6.04	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.96	1.93	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.54	8.26	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.01	37.67	-9.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLSA.TO vs. HAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.87, which is comparable to the HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSA.TO and HAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLSA.TO	HAL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.87	4.46	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.25	0.79	+3.46

Drawdowns

CLSA.TO vs. HAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSA.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, smaller than the maximum HAL.TO drawdown of -39.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSA.TO and HAL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSA.TO	HAL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.73%	-39.70%	+27.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.78%	-5.15%	-5.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.44%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.43%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	0.00%	-1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.37%	-4.19%	+2.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	1.13%	+1.38%

Volatility

CLSA.TO vs. HAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) at 2.48%. This indicates that CLSA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLSA.TO	HAL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	2.48%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.36%	7.85%	+4.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.48%	9.53%	+4.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	12.36%	+4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	14.85%	+1.69%

CLSA.TO vs. HAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSA.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HAL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSA.TO vs. HAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

CLSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.76%, more than HAL.TO's 1.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	10.76%	7.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF	1.97%	2.37%	2.79%	3.60%	4.84%	2.99%	3.56%	2.96%	3.43%	3.17%	2.84%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSA.TO and HAL.TO in my portfolio?

CLSA.TO and HAL.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSA.TO or HAL.TO?

On fees, CLSA.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSA.TO or HAL.TO?

CLSA.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for HAL.TO.

What is the main difference between CLSA.TO and HAL.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Brompton Funds and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CLSA.TO and 0.67% for HAL.TO.