CLPAX vs. GIDHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX).
CLPAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 30, 2013. GIDHX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 30, 2008.
Performance
CLPAX vs. GIDHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLPAX vs. GIDHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLPAX Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund | -6.01% | 12.32% | 11.42% | 35.92% | -30.54% | 13.11% | 5.25% | 19.41% | -3.65% | 8.20% |
GIDHX Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund | 4.55% | 28.92% | -2.17% | 16.16% | -13.41% | 9.36% | 1.20% | 14.82% | -12.96% | 23.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLPAX achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than GIDHX's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CLPAX has underperformed GIDHX with an annualized return of 5.45%, while GIDHX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.54% annualized return.
CLPAX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -6.20%
- 1Y
- 14.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 5.45%
GIDHX
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLPAX vs. GIDHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLPAX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than GIDHX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CLPAX vs. GIDHX — Risk / Return Rank
CLPAX
GIDHX
CLPAX vs. GIDHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLPAX | GIDHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.62 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 2.25 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.16 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | 10.26 | -6.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLPAX | GIDHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.62 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.48 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.43 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.33 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLPAX and GIDHX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CLPAX vs. GIDHX - Dividend Comparison
CLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than GIDHX's 2.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLPAX Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund | 9.69% | 9.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.68% | 0.32% | 0.49% | 5.41% | 0.30% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 17.26% |
GIDHX Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund | 2.78% | 2.58% | 3.27% | 3.56% | 0.58% | 3.09% | 2.65% | 3.24% | 3.42% | 2.54% | 3.08% | 4.13% |
Drawdowns
CLPAX vs. GIDHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLPAX drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, smaller than the maximum GIDHX drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLPAX and GIDHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLPAX | GIDHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.47% | -36.19% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.87% | -10.38% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.47% | -28.46% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.47% | -36.19% | +3.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.89% | -4.62% | -7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -8.24% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 2.26% | +2.06% |
Volatility
CLPAX vs. GIDHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) is 3.45%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that CLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIDHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLPAX | GIDHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 7.05% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 9.86% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 15.79% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 14.65% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 15.39% | -1.00% |