CLOX vs. FLXR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CLOX (Eldridge AAA CLO ETF) and FLXR (TCW Flexible Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOX is a CLO fund actively managed by Eldridge, while FLXR is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CLOX returned 5.23% vs 4.12% for FLXR. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CLOX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FLXR.

Performance

CLOX vs. FLXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eldridge AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOX achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly higher than FLXR's 1.30% return.

CLOX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.11%
• 6M: 2.30%
• YTD: 2.77%
• 1Y: 5.23%
• 3Y*: 6.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.39%

FLXR

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.36%
• 6M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 1Y: 4.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CLOX Eldridge AAA CLO ETF	$4.44M	$3.63M	$4.03M
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	$14.67M	$16.19M	$17.11M

CLOX vs. FLXR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CLOX Eldridge AAA CLO ETF	2.77%	5.52%	3.29%
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	1.30%	8.37%	4.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOX and FLXR is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	0.14

Return for Risk

CLOX vs. FLXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLOX

CLOX Risk / Return Rank: 98
CLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FLXR

FLXR Risk / Return Rank: 85
FLXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FLXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FLXR Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FLXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FLXR Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLOX vs. FLXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eldridge AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) and TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOX	FLXR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.14	1.95	+2.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.83	2.84	+3.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.04	1.36	+0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.93	3.10	+4.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.18	12.66	+28.52

CLOX vs. FLXR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOX Sharpe Ratio is 4.14, which is higher than the FLXR Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOX and FLXR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOX vs. FLXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOX drawdown since its inception was -4.13%, which is greater than FLXR's maximum drawdown of -1.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOX and FLXR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOX	FLXR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-1.94%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.66%	-1.46%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.46%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-0.35%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	0.36%	-0.23%

Volatility

CLOX vs. FLXR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eldridge AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) is 0.31%, while TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) has a volatility of 0.67%. This indicates that CLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOX	FLXR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.31%	0.67%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.93%	1.85%	-0.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26%	2.33%	-1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.25%	2.79%	+0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.25%	2.79%	+0.46%

CLOX vs. FLXR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOX vs. FLXR - Dividend Comparison

CLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than FLXR's 5.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLOX Eldridge AAA CLO ETF	4.94%	5.18%	6.25%	2.90%
FLXR TCW Flexible Income ETF	5.47%	5.66%	3.44%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOX and FLXR in my portfolio?

CLOX and FLXR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOX or FLXR?

FLXR has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to CLOX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOX dropped -4.13% vs FLXR's -1.94%.

Which ETF is better, CLOX or FLXR?

On 1-year performance, CLOX leads with 5.23% vs 4.12% for FLXR. On fees, CLOX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CLOX has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOX or FLXR?

Over the 1-year period, CLOX has performed better with a 5.23% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOX or FLXR?

CLOX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FLXR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOX or FLXR?

FLXR has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 4.94% for CLOX.

What is the main difference between CLOX and FLXR?

CLOX is categorized as CLO, while FLXR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Eldridge and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CLOX and 0.40% for FLXR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.14 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.