PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOV vs. PAYO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLOV vs. PAYO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clover Health Investments, Corp. (CLOV) and Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOV achieves a 101.28% return, which is significantly higher than PAYO's 20.11% return.


CLOV

1D
-3.47%
1M
33.24%
YTD
101.28%
6M
75.19%
1Y
61.43%
3Y*
66.22%
5Y*
-20.64%
10Y*

PAYO

1D
0.00%
1M
36.92%
YTD
20.11%
6M
13.26%
1Y
-2.17%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOV vs. PAYO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLOV
Clover Health Investments, Corp.
101.28%-25.40%230.85%2.43%-75.01%-71.32%
PAYO
Payoneer Global Inc.
20.11%-44.02%92.71%-4.75%-25.58%-34.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOV and PAYO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2021

0.37

The correlation between CLOV and PAYO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLOV:

$2.47B

PAYO:

$2.37B

EPS

CLOV:

-$0.11

PAYO:

$0.20

PS Ratio

CLOV:

1.10

PAYO:

2.33

PB Ratio

CLOV:

7.28

PAYO:

3.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLOV:

$2.21B

PAYO:

$1.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLOV:

$939.14M

PAYO:

$660.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLOV:

-$55.21M

PAYO:

$204.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOV vs. PAYO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOV
CLOV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CLOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PAYO
PAYO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PAYO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOV vs. PAYO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clover Health Investments, Corp. (CLOV) and Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLOVPAYODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.04

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

-0.05

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.02

-0.09

+2.11

CLOV vs. PAYO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOV Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the PAYO Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOV and PAYO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLOV vs. PAYO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOV drawdown since its inception was -97.19%, which is greater than PAYO's maximum drawdown of -69.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOV and PAYO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOVPAYODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.19%

-69.06%

-28.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.50%

-42.45%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.73%

-61.36%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.65%

-39.46%

-39.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.59%

-43.06%

-33.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.46%

23.76%

+6.70%

Volatility

CLOV vs. PAYO - Volatility Comparison

Clover Health Investments, Corp. (CLOV) has a higher volatility of 26.03% compared to Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) at 24.55%. This indicates that CLOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAYO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOVPAYODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.03%

24.55%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.15%

43.67%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.33%

53.15%

+18.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.38%

56.64%

+20.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.80%

56.64%

+29.16%

Dividends

CLOV vs. PAYO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLOV nor PAYO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLOV vs. PAYO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clover Health Investments, Corp. and Payoneer Global Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
749.19M
261.60M
(CLOV) Total Revenue
(PAYO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLOV vs. PAYO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Clover Health Investments, Corp. and Payoneer Global Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
92.4%
0
Portfolio components
CLOV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clover Health Investments, Corp. reported a gross profit of 692.13M and revenue of 749.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.4%.

PAYO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Payoneer Global Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 261.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CLOV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clover Health Investments, Corp. reported an operating income of 27.33M and revenue of 749.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

PAYO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Payoneer Global Inc. reported an operating income of 30.02M and revenue of 261.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

CLOV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clover Health Investments, Corp. reported a net income of 27.33M and revenue of 749.19M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

PAYO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Payoneer Global Inc. reported a net income of 19.57M and revenue of 261.60M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLOV and PAYO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLOV has higher volatility (26.03%) compared to PAYO (24.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOV dropped -97.19% vs PAYO's -69.06%.

CLOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOV and PAYO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer