CLOO vs. CLOB
CLOO (NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF) and CLOB (VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CLOB.
Performance
CLOO vs. CLOB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 5.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOO vs. CLOB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 1.10% |
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOO and CLOB is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOO vs. CLOB — Risk / Return Rank
CLOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLOB
CLOO vs. CLOB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO) and VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLOO | CLOB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOO vs. CLOB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOO drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum CLOB drawdown of -5.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOO and CLOB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOO | CLOB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -5.54% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.14% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.29% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.45% | — |
Volatility
CLOO vs. CLOB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOO | CLOB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48% | 2.85% | -2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.48% | 5.36% | -4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.48% | 5.36% | -4.88% |
CLOO vs. CLOB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOB's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOO vs. CLOB - Dividend Comparison
CLOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than CLOB's 6.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF | 6.33% | 6.61% | 1.65% |
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOO and CLOB have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLOO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLOO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CLOB.
CLOB has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 0.59% for CLOO.
They also come from different issuers: New York Life Investment Management and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CLOO and 0.45% for CLOB.
Find the right allocation for CLOO and CLOB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer