CLOI vs. FLCB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) and Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB).

CLOI and FLCB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLOI is an actively managed fund by VanEck. It was launched on Jun 21, 2022. FLCB is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Sep 19, 2019.

Performance

CLOI vs. FLCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) and Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLOI vs. FLCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	0.62%	5.84%	8.26%	8.95%	2.59%
FLCB Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF	0.08%	6.95%	1.59%	5.72%	-2.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOI achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than FLCB's 0.08% return.

CLOI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 1.95%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 7.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLCB

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: 0.08%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: 3.67%
• 5Y*: 0.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOI vs. FLCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCB's 0.15% expense ratio.

CLOI

VanEck CLO ETF

FLCB

Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF

Return for Risk

CLOI vs. FLCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOI

CLOI Risk / Return Rank: 73
CLOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CLOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CLOI Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CLOI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FLCB

FLCB Risk / Return Rank: 48
FLCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FLCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FLCB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FLCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FLCB Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOI vs. FLCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) and Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOI	FLCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	0.93	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.32	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.17	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	1.66	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.89	4.63	+8.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLOI vs. FLCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOI Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the FLCB Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOI and FLCB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOI	FLCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	0.93	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.68	0.16	+2.52

Correlation

The correlation between CLOI and FLCB is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLOI vs. FLCB - Dividend Comparison

CLOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than FLCB's 4.23% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	5.48%	5.61%	6.71%	5.61%	2.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLCB Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF	4.23%	4.19%	4.10%	3.40%	2.73%	2.28%	3.24%	0.73%

Drawdowns

CLOI vs. FLCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOI drawdown since its inception was -3.25%, smaller than the maximum FLCB drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOI and FLCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOI	FLCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.25%	-18.82%	+15.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.00%	-2.57%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-2.54%	+2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.19%	-6.74%	+6.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.42%	0.93%	-0.51%

Volatility

CLOI vs. FLCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) is 0.44%, while Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) has a volatility of 1.71%. This indicates that CLOI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOI	FLCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	1.71%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.74%	2.60%	-1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	4.31%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.61%	5.72%	-3.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.61%	5.54%	-2.93%