PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOD vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOD vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOD achieves a -8.39% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.63% return.


CLOD

1D
0.22%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
-8.39%
6M
-9.76%
1Y
-8.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.44%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
23.52%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOD vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CLOD
Themes Cloud Computing ETF
-8.39%7.53%21.03%0.77%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.63%9.04%35.41%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD and YCS is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023

0.02

The correlation between CLOD and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOD vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOD
CLOD Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CLOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOD vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLODYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.34

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

3.78

-4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

11.93

-12.52

CLOD vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOD and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLOD vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLODYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.36%

-49.56%

+18.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.36%

-8.30%

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.33%

-0.14%

-17.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-19.87%

+12.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.63%

2.65%

+11.98%

Volatility

CLOD vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) has a higher volatility of 11.59% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that CLOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLODYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.59%

2.25%

+9.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.32%

12.19%

+10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.74%

16.93%

+8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.54%

21.10%

+3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.54%

18.82%

+5.72%

CLOD vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOD vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

CLOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
CLOD
Themes Cloud Computing ETF
1.60%1.47%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLOD and YCS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLOD has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOD dropped -31.36% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 31.27% vs -8.67% for CLOD. On fees, CLOD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 31.27% return vs -8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLOD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

CLOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

CLOD is categorized as Technology Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. CLOD tracks Solactive Cloud Technology Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Themes and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CLOD and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOD and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer