PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOB vs. FLRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLOB vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLOB vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CLOB
VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF
-0.27%6.94%2.81%
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
0.77%5.01%1.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOB achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 0.77% return.


CLOB

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
1.20%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLRN

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.91%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
2.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOB vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CLOB vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOB
CLOB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CLOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRN
FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOB vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOBFLRNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

2.49

-1.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.94

3.11

-2.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

2.05

-0.79

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

3.21

-2.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.90

26.27

-19.37

CLOB vs. FLRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOB Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the FLRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOB and FLRN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOBFLRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

2.49

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.49

+0.61

Correlation

The correlation between CLOB and FLRN is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLOB vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

CLOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than FLRN's 4.65% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLOB
VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF
6.65%6.61%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
4.65%4.89%5.67%5.68%1.95%0.39%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.64%1.06%0.63%

Drawdowns

CLOB vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOB drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOB and FLRN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOBFLRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-14.64%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.25%

-1.43%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.07%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-1.85%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.17%

+0.63%

Volatility

CLOB vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison

VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.36%. This indicates that CLOB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLOBFLRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

0.36%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

0.55%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.01%

1.82%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

1.69%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

4.21%

+1.55%