PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLNK vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLNK vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLNK

1D
-4.18%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBIT

1D
5.42%
1M
46.58%
YTD
37.02%
6M
52.37%
1Y
68.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLNK vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CLNK and SBIT is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026

-0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLNK vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLNK

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLNK vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLNK vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLNKSBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.14

-0.46

-0.68

Drawdowns

CLNK vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLNK drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNK and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLNKSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-91.35%

+47.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.92%

-78.26%

+36.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.34%

-68.55%

+36.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.69%

Volatility

CLNK vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLNKSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.16%

87.18%

-20.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.16%

97.47%

-30.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.16%

97.47%

-30.31%

CLNK vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLNK has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLNK vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

CLNK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.


PositionTTM20252024
CLNK
Bitwise Chainlink ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.42%0.52%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLNK and SBIT have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLNK is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLNK is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for CLNK.

CLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK) spot price, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CLNK and 0.95% for SBIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLNK and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer