CLNE vs. BEAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) and Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT).

Performance

CLNE vs. BEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) and Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLNE vs. BEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLNE Clean Energy Fuels Corp.	18.10%	-16.33%	-34.46%	-26.35%	-15.17%	-29.86%
BEAT Heartbeam, Inc.	-49.17%	4.35%	-2.13%	-51.84%	58.44%	-34.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLNE : $547.21M BEAT : $41.13M
EPS CLNE : -$1.01 BEAT : -$0.62
PB Ratio CLNE : 0.98 BEAT : 15.80
Total Revenue (TTM) CLNE : $425.15M BEAT : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) CLNE : -$3.33M BEAT : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) CLNE : -$127.25M BEAT : -$21.14M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLNE achieves a 18.10% return, which is significantly higher than BEAT's -49.17% return.

CLNE

• 1D: -3.88%
• 1M: 9.73%
• YTD: 18.10%
• 6M: -3.88%
• 1Y: 60.00%
• 3Y*: -17.14%
• 5Y*: -29.77%
• 10Y*: -1.48%

BEAT

• 1D: 8.93%
• 1M: -19.21%
• YTD: -49.17%
• 6M: -26.06%
• 1Y: -39.30%
• 3Y*: -18.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLNE vs. BEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLNE

CLNE Risk / Return Rank: 72
CLNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CLNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CLNE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CLNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CLNE Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BEAT

BEAT Risk / Return Rank: 33
BEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLNE vs. BEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) and Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLNE	BEAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	-0.26	+1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	0.64	+1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.09	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	-0.53	+2.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.11	-0.99	+4.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLNE vs. BEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLNE Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the BEAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLNE and BEAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLNE	BEAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	-0.26	+1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	-0.22	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between CLNE and BEAT is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLNE vs. BEAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLNE nor BEAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CLNE vs. BEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLNE drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than BEAT's maximum drawdown of -90.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNE and BEAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLNE	BEAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.48%	-90.19%	-5.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.37%	-70.87%	+39.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.63%	-79.46%	-10.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.25%	-60.61%	-5.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.08%	37.91%	-20.83%

Volatility

CLNE vs. BEAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) is 15.26%, while Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT) has a volatility of 25.14%. This indicates that CLNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLNE	BEAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.26%	25.14%	-9.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.77%	129.23%	-91.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.02%	148.95%	-85.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.51%	118.68%	-51.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.61%	118.68%	-47.07%

Financials