CLNE vs. BEAT
CLNE (Clean Energy Fuels Corp.) and BEAT (Heartbeam, Inc.) are both stocks. Over the past 3 years, CLNE returned -26.32%/yr vs -45.19%/yr for BEAT. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CLNE vs. BEAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLNE achieves a -7.62% return, which is significantly higher than BEAT's -79.14% return.
CLNE
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -11.82%
- YTD
- -7.62%
- 1Y
- -1.52%
- 3Y*
- -26.32%
- 5Y*
- -23.72%
- 10Y*
- -3.46%
- ALL TIME*
- -9.06%
BEAT
- 1D
- -3.21%
- 1M
- -30.47%
- 6M
- -65.48%
- YTD
- -79.14%
- 1Y
- -50.92%
- 3Y*
- -45.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -39.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
BEAT Heartbeam, Inc. | $175.70K | $598.50K | $582.72K |
| $2.63M | $3.54M | $3.20M |
CLNE vs. BEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLNE Clean Energy Fuels Corp. | -7.62% | -16.33% | -34.46% | -26.35% | -15.17% | -29.70% |
BEAT Heartbeam, Inc. | -79.14% | 4.35% | -2.13% | -51.84% | 58.44% | -42.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLNE and BEAT is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
CLNE:
$427.24M
BEAT:
$17.24M
CLNE:
-$0.45
BEAT:
-$0.56
CLNE:
0.76
BEAT:
32.00
CLNE:
$438.94M
BEAT:
$0.00
CLNE:
$51.37M
BEAT:
$0.00
CLNE:
-$13.12M
BEAT:
-$20.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLNE vs. BEAT — Risk / Return Rank
CLNE
BEAT
CLNE vs. BEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) and Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLNE | BEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.04 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | -0.65 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | -1.03 | +0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLNE vs. BEAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLNE drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, roughly equal to the maximum BEAT drawdown of -91.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNE and BEAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLNE | BEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.48% | -91.57% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.46% | -85.45% | +41.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.55% | -85.45% | +13.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.89% | -91.57% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.67% | -63.51% | -3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.30% | 54.22% | -29.92% |
Volatility
CLNE vs. BEAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) is 15.17%, while Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT) has a volatility of 26.30%. This indicates that CLNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLNE | BEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.17% | 26.30% | -11.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.19% | 63.45% | -28.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.20% | 152.81% | -99.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.64% | 117.06% | -53.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.36% | 117.06% | -45.70% |
Dividends
CLNE vs. BEAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLNE nor BEAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CLNE vs. BEAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clean Energy Fuels Corp. and Heartbeam, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CLNE and BEAT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEAT has higher volatility (26.30%) compared to CLNE (15.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLNE dropped -95.48% vs BEAT's -91.57%.
CLNE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLNE and BEAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer