CLNE vs. ACES

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES).

ACES is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2018.

Performance

CLNE vs. ACES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLNE vs. ACES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CLNE Clean Energy Fuels Corp.	18.10%	-16.33%	-34.46%	-26.35%	-15.17%	-22.01%	235.90%	36.05%	-53.39%
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF	3.39%	25.44%	-26.71%	-20.04%	-28.44%	-19.44%	140.33%	51.70%	-9.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLNE achieves a 18.10% return, which is significantly higher than ACES's 3.39% return.

CLNE

• 1D: -3.88%
• 1M: 9.73%
• YTD: 18.10%
• 6M: -3.88%
• 1Y: 60.00%
• 3Y*: -17.14%
• 5Y*: -29.77%
• 10Y*: -1.48%

ACES

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 47.29%
• 3Y*: -9.44%
• 5Y*: -14.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLNE vs. ACES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLNE

CLNE Risk / Return Rank: 72
CLNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CLNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CLNE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CLNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CLNE Martin Ratio Rank: 68

ACES

ACES Risk / Return Rank: 74
ACES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ACES Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ACES Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ACES Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ACES Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLNE vs. ACES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLNE	ACES	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	1.36	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.93	-0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.23	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	2.66	-0.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.11	6.60	-3.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLNE vs. ACES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLNE Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the ACES Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLNE and ACES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLNE	ACES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	1.36	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.44	-0.41	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	0.14	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between CLNE and ACES is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CLNE vs. ACES - Dividend Comparison

CLNE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CLNE Clean Energy Fuels Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF	0.68%	0.70%	1.10%	1.44%	1.08%	0.71%	0.56%	1.79%	0.34%

Drawdowns

CLNE vs. ACES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLNE drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than ACES's maximum drawdown of -79.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNE and ACES.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLNE	ACES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.48%	-79.05%	-16.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.37%	-17.44%	-13.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.91%	-74.44%	-16.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.63%	-64.99%	-24.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.25%	-38.35%	-27.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.08%	7.03%	+10.05%

Volatility

CLNE vs. ACES - Volatility Comparison

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) at 10.50%. This indicates that CLNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLNE	ACES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.26%	10.50%	+4.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.77%	25.76%	+12.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.02%	35.00%	+28.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.51%	36.22%	+31.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.61%	35.71%	+35.90%