PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEAT vs. AYTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BEAT vs. AYTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT) and Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEAT achieves a -70.41% return, which is significantly lower than AYTU's -13.46% return.


BEAT

1D
-6.52%
1M
-19.18%
YTD
-70.41%
6M
-75.76%
1Y
-53.28%
3Y*
-33.73%
5Y*
10Y*

AYTU

1D
-2.60%
1M
2.74%
YTD
-13.46%
6M
-15.09%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
-54.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEAT vs. AYTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BEAT
Heartbeam, Inc.
-70.41%4.35%-2.13%-51.84%58.44%-42.96%
AYTU
Aytu BioPharma, Inc.
-13.46%52.94%-40.14%-24.87%-86.00%-43.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BEAT and AYTU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BEAT:

$28.82M

AYTU:

$23.65M

EPS

BEAT:

-$0.57

AYTU:

-$2.91

PB Ratio

BEAT:

45.39

AYTU:

0.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

BEAT:

$0.00

AYTU:

$56.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BEAT:

$0.00

AYTU:

$36.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

BEAT:

-$20.29M

AYTU:

-$27.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEAT vs. AYTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEAT
BEAT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

AYTU
AYTU Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AYTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYTU Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
AYTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYTU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEAT vs. AYTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT) and Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEATAYTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.09

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

0.35

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

0.81

-1.93

BEAT vs. AYTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the AYTU Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEAT and AYTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BEAT vs. AYTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEAT drawdown since its inception was -90.19%, smaller than the maximum AYTU drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEAT and AYTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEATAYTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.19%

-100.00%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.36%

-35.47%

-43.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.13%

-70.24%

-11.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.05%

-100.00%

+11.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.87%

-95.27%

+32.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.72%

15.55%

+32.17%

Volatility

BEAT vs. AYTU - Volatility Comparison

Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT) and Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU) have volatilities of 15.82% and 16.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEATAYTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.82%

16.13%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.30%

34.71%

+29.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

150.21%

55.79%

+94.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.47%

85.38%

+32.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.47%

187.85%

-70.38%

Dividends

BEAT vs. AYTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BEAT nor AYTU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BEAT vs. AYTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Heartbeam, Inc. and Aytu BioPharma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00M30.00M35.00M202220232024202520260
12.41M
(BEAT) Total Revenue
(AYTU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BEAT and AYTU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AYTU has higher volatility (16.13%) compared to BEAT (15.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEAT dropped -90.19% vs AYTU's -100.00%.

AYTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEAT and AYTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer